Case File
efta-02728762DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02728762
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02728762
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
Case No.: 502006CF009454AXXXMB
STATE OF FLORIDA
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
COMES
NOW, Witness Y. Doe,' by and through undersigned counsel,
respectfully moves for a protective order pursuant to Florida Rule Criminal Procedure
3.220(1)(1), requiring that the deposition of Y. Doe be taken in this matter in conjunction
with and at the same time with the deposition of Y. Doe in the civil case captioned Jane
Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein, case no. 08-CV-80232-Marra/Johnson, United States
District Court for the Southern District of Florida. As grounds therefore, Witness Y. Doe
states as follows:
1.
Y. Doe has been subpoenaed for deposition in this case by the Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein. The subpoena schedules the deposition for April 2, 2008.
2.
Y. Doe is a victim in this matter who alleges that she was sexually
assaulted by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein when she was 16 years old. Y. Doe has brought a
civil case against Defendant Epstein captioned Jane Doe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein, case
' The witness is named here anonymously as "Y. Doe" because of the sensitive
allegations of sex abuse upon a minor involved in this case.
09/1212019
79
Agency to Agency Requet 19-411
CONFIP153ENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00330114
EFTA 00202840
EFTA02728762
no. 08-CV-80232-Marra/Johnson, United States District Court for the Southern District
of Florida. This civil case alleges sexual assault against Defendant Epstein.
3.
It is anticipated that Y. Doe will be questioned on the same facts and
issues regarding her encounter with Jeffrey Epstein in both the civil and criminal cases.
4.
It would protect the victim from harassment, as well as undue and
necessary emotional stress and trauma, to have her deposition taken only once by
Defendant Epstein, rather than requiring that she unnecessarily revisit the emotional and
traumatic facts in separate depositions for each case.
5.
It would not prejudice the defense in its investigation or preparation of this
case if the depositions in the civil case and the criminal case were conducted at the same
time.
6.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(1)(1) provides that the Court
may issue a protective order "as is appropriate to protect the witness from harassment,
unnecessary inconvenience, or invasion of privacy, including prohibiting the taking of the
deposition." Further Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.220(h)(1) contemplates that a witness in Y. Doe's
circumstances will only be subject to one deposition: "In any case, no person shall be
deposed more than once except by consent of the parties or by order of the court issued
on good cause shown."
7.
This Court has the inherent authority to protect witnesses in a criminal
case from potential emotional harm. State v. Ford, 626 So.2d 1338 (Fla. 1993)• State v.
Tarrago, 800 So.2d 300 (Ma. 3d DCA 2001). A requirement that a single deposition be
taken by Defendant Epstein for both the civil and criminal cases will avoid unnecessary
emotional harm to Y. Doe. Finally, the taking of two separate depositions of Y. Doe by
OW 2,2019
pagho
CONFIDENTIAL
Agency to Agency Raquel: 19-411
SDNY_GM_00330115
EFTA_00202841
EFTA02728763
Defendant Epstein would be harassment. A protective order under rule 3.220(1)(1) would
prevent this harassment.
8.
Counsel for Witness Y. Doe has contacted both the attorneys for the State
and for Defendant Epstein regarding this request, and neither has responded.
WHEREFORE, Witness Y. Doe respectfully requests a protective order requiring
that the deposition in the criminal case and the civil case captioned Jane Doe No. 3 v.
Jeffrey Epstein, case no. 08-CV-80232-Marra/Johnson, United States District Court for
the Southern District of Florida, be taken at the same time, and for such further relief as
this Court deems just and proper.
Dated: March 31, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A.
Attorneys for Witness Y. Doe
18205 Biscayne Blvd.
Suite 2218
Miami Florida 33160
Florida Bar No. 521647
Stuart S. Mermelstein
Florida Bar No. 947245
Adam D. Horowitz
Florida Bar No. 376980
09/12/2019
Pagi 81
Agency to Agency Requet 19-011
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_aM_00330116
EFTA_00202842
EFTA02728764
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by
facsimile and U.S. mail on this the
day of fr
4-rr-A, 2008 to: Jack A.
Goldberger, Esq., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL
33401; Latina Leigh Belohlavek, Esq., State Attorney's Office, 401 N. Dixie Hwy., West
Palm Beach, FL 33401-4209.
09/12/2019
PI
CONFIDENTIAL
Agency to Agency Requet: 19411
SDNY_GM_00330117
EFTA_00202843
EFTA02728765
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01660024
13p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01660024
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01481978
106p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01481978
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01660040
37p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01689427
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.