Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02728830DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02728830

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02728830
Pages
6
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 08-80069 GIV-MARRA £fl JUDO JOHNSON FILED by ITAKE JAN 2 4 2008 ac.47",71 °Willb. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 1 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), by and through Jane Doe's Father as parent and natural guardian, and Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother, individually, bring this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows: Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue 1. Jane Doe is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida. She is a minor under the age of 18 years. 2. Jane Doe's Father brings this action individually and as parent and natural guardian of Jane Doc. Jane Doe's Father is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida. 3. Jane Doe's Stepmother brings this action individually. Jane Doe's Stepmother is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida. 4. This Complaint is brought under fictitious names to protect the identity of the Minor Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon a HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN. P. A. 09/12/2019 CONFIDENTIAL www.hermanlaw.com Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00330200 EFTA_00202926 EFTA02728830 minor. 5. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York. 6. This is an action for damages in excess of $50 million. 7. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §I 332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and (ii) is between citizens of different states. 8. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District. Factual Allegations 9. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, 52 years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St. Thomas and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach. 10. Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 2005, Jane Doe, then 14 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims. 11. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St. Thomas. 12. An integral player in Epstein's Florida scheme was Haley Robson, a Palm Beach HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. 09/12/2019 - 2 - 71 1ge 1 CONFIDENTIAL vAwthermanlaw.com Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00330201 EFTA_00202927 EFTA02728831 Community College student from Loxahatchee, Florida. She recruited girls ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Under Epstein's plan, Ms. Robson would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf directed Ms. Robson to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. Ms. Robson, upon information and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally $200 to $300 per "massage" session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan. 13. Epstein's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Upon arrival at Epstein's mansion, Mr. Robson would introduce each victim to Sarah Kellen, Epstein's assistant, who gathered the girl's personal information, including her name and telephone number. Ms. Kellen would then bring the girl up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table in addition to other furnishings. There were photographs of nude women lining the stairway hall and in the bedroom. Ms. Kellen would then leave the girl alone in this room, whereupon Epstein would enter wearing only a towel. He would then remove his towel, lay down naked on the massage table, and direct the girl to remove her clothes. He then would perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl's vagina with a vibrator. 14. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Ms. Robson recruited Jane Doe to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation. Ms. Robson brought Jane to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane was introduced to Sarah Kellen, who led her up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. She was alone in the room when Epstein arrived wearing only a towel. He HERMAN & MERMELETEIN, P. A. www.hernianlaw.com 09/12/2019 - 3 - CONFI algiNTIAL Agency to Agency Requet 19-411 SDNY_GM_00330202 EFTA_00202928 EFTA02728832 removed his towel, and laid down naked on the massage table. He demanded that Jane remove her clothes. In shock, fear and trepidation, Jane complied, removing her clothes except for her underwear. Epstein then sexually assaulted Jane. 15. After Epstein had completed the assault, he left the room. Jane was then able to get dressed, leave the room and go back down the stairs. She then met Ms. Robson again who brought Jane home. Jane was paid $300 by Epstein. Ms. Robson was paid $200 by Epstein for bringingJane to him. 16. As a result of this encounter with Epstein, the l4-year old Jane experienced confusion, shame, humiliation, embarrassment and the assault sent her life into a downward spiral. COUNT I Sexual Assault 17. PlaintiffJane Doe by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above. 18. Epstein tortiously assaulted Jane Doe sexually in or about 2005. 19. This sexual assault was in violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes, which recognizes as a crime the lewd and lascivious acts committed by Epstein upon Jane. 20. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages. WHEREFORE, PlaintiffJane Doe, by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN . P. A. 09/12/2019 - 4 - Page73 CO N F NT IAL w‘•AN.herrnanlaw.com Agency to Agency Requet 19-411 SONY_GM_00330203 EFTA_00202929 EFTA02728833 COUNT II Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 21. Plaintiffs Jane Doe by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother, individually, repeat and reallege paragraphs 1 through 16 above. 22. Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless. 23. Epstcin's conduct was outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency. 24. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress not only to Jane Doe, but also to her parents, Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother. Epstein Icnew or had reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to Jane Doe's parents. 25. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, Jane Does' Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother have suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Jane Doe by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother demand judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT III Loss of Parental Consortium 26. Plaintiff Jane Doe's Father repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above. 27. Epstein's tortious conduct is the direct and proximate cause of damages to Jane Doe's Father, consisting of parental loss of comfort, companionship and society and healthcare costs HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN. P. A. 09112/2019 Page 174 CONFIDENTIAL www.hermanlaw.com Agency to Agency Requet 19-411 SIDNY_GM_00 330204 EFTA_00202930 EFTA02728834 associated with the treatment of Jane. 28. Jane Doe's Father experienced and will continue to experience great mental anguish, pain and suffering from the time that Defendant's tortious conduct occurred. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe's Father demands judgment for loss of consortium damages, costs and such other and further relief as this Court deems proper. JURY TRIAL DEMAND Plaintiffs demand a jury trial in this action. Dated: January 924 2008 Respectfully submitted, HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. 09/12/2019 HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931.0877 By: Je M. Herman errnanahermanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 521647 Stuart S. Mermelstein smennelsteina.hermanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 947245 Adam D. Horowitz Florida Bar No. 376980 ahorowitaahennanlaw.com Page 175 CONFIDENTIAL www.hermanlaw.com Agency to Agency Raquel: 19411 SDNY_GM_00330205 EFTA 0020293I EFTA02728835

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02729648

53p
Court UnsealedFeb 3, 2024

Epstein Drop One

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01308056

0p
Court UnsealedJan 4, 2024

Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01308056

22p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.