Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
02/05/2003 TUE 12:38
FAX Ricci Leopold PA
MO01/006
FLORIDA
CASE NO: 2006 CF 009454 A
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Defendant.
Jane Doe No. 1 ("Jane Doe"), by and through her mother and natural guardian, hereby
files this Motion for Protective Order. As grounds for said motion, Jane Doc states as follows:
1.
On July 19, 2006 the State of Florida filed a criminal indictment against Jeffrey
Epstein ("Epstein").
2.
Jane Doc, a victim of Epstein's actions, recently filed a civil lawsuit against
Epstein. The complaint alleges among other things that Epstein has a sexual preference and
obsession for underage minor girls. That he engaged in a scheme in which he gained access to
minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. Jane Doe was
one of Epstein's victims. She was lured into Epstein's Palm Beach home under false pretenses
and was sexually assaulted by Epstein. As a result, Jane Doe suffered injuries, including
intentional infliction of emotional distress damages.
09/12/2019
CONFib
e4ENTIAL
Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011
SDNY_GM_00330432
EFTA 00203158
EFTA02728903
us/up/tun rut Li: 3a
FAX Alcoa Leopold PA
0002/006
3.
After the filing of the civil lawsuit and during the week of January 25, 2008,
Epstein's criminal attorney, Jack Goldberger, Esq., contacted the undersigned to advise that he
wished to take the deposition, in the criminal matter, of Jane Doe on February 6, 2008. The
undersigned informed Mr. Goldberger that he would accept service on behalf of Jane Doe, but
was not available on February 6, 2008. Counsel agreed to use best efforts to schedule the
deposition at a mutually convenient date and time.
4.
Despite these assurances and understanding, on Friday evening, February 1, 2008,
Epstein's process server served Jane Doe at her place of work for a deposition scheduled to take
place on February 6, 2008. 1 See Subpeiona attached as Exhibit "A" (Jane Doe's real name has
been redacted from the exhibit).
5.
The undersigned was forced to call Mr. Goldberger on Friday evening and remind
him of our earlier conversation and agreement and to insist that the deposition be re-noticed.2
6.
After the conversation of Friday evening and with the expressed assurances that
the undersigned would accept service for Jane Doe, two days later on Monday morning February
4, 2008, Mr. Goldberger had a process server serve Jane Doe's mother who resides out of state in
Waleska, Georgia. See Subpoena attached as Exhibit "ft" (Jane Doe's mother's name has been
redacted from the exhibit).
7.
The service of process on Jane Doe's mother was defective as an Out of State
Commissioner was never appointed and no order was issued by this court authorizing such
service. Additionally, Mr. Goldberger had been told not once, but twice that the undersign would
accept service on behalf of Jane Doe, yet despite this Epstein and/or his attorney has insisted on
'Mr. Goldberger unilaterally set Jane Doc's deposition for February 6, 2008 despite knowing that the undersigned
was not available on that date.
2 Mr. Goldberger has now agreed to postpone the deposition.
Page 2 of 3
09112/2019
CONFIDENTIAL
Page
4
Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
SDNY_GM_00330433
EFTA 00203159
EFTA02728904
YL/UVLUUU TUE 12:J9
FAX
RicCi keopold PA
0003/006
having the victim's privacy repeatedly intruded upon by process servers seeking her out at her
employment and then again, intruding upon her mother.
8.
Additionally, during this same time period yet another adult male came to Jane
Does' employment and represented himself as an "attorney" who needed to contract her. Upon
information and belief that person was also an agent of Mr. Epstein's.
9.
It can only be concluded that Epstein and/or his counsel are purposefully
attempting to harass Jane Doe and her mother. These actions arc nothing more than a continuous
insult to injury upon a young girl who has already been emotionally scarred for life.
WHEREFORE, Jane Doe, by and through Jane Doe's mother and natural guardian,
hereby move the Court for a Protective Order prohibiting Jeffrey Epstein and/or his counsel from
continuous and systematic harassment.
!HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished by
Facsimile and U. S. Mail, postage prepaid, this C
day of February 2008 to all counsel on the
attached service list.
09/12/2019
Respectfully submitted,
RICCI—LEOPOLD, P.A.
2925 PGA Blvd.
Suite 200
Page 3 of 3
Page46
CO N F
NTIAL
Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411
SDNY_GM_00330434
EFTA_00203 I 60
EFTA02728905