Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02729079DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02729079

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02729079
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY IIFITENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA NAND FOR PALM BEACJI MINTY BARRY E. KRISCHER STAIII ATTORNEY GUY P. FRONSTIN, ESQUIRE 515 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE SUITE 300 WEST PALM BEACH, ft 33401 Re: State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein Dear Guy: April 17, 2006 By this letter, I am confirming the offer of settlement to your client, Jeffrey Epstein. Should you accept this settlement, the state will not proceed with Grand Jury proceedings tomorrow. Plea to Aggravated Assault with the Intent to Commit a Felony, a third degree felony. Adjudication will be withheld and your client will be placed on 5 years probation with the following conditions: no contact, direct or indirect, with victi, no contact with minors unless supervised b with knowledge of the underlying facts, but in no case shall the supervising adult by or psycho-sexual evaluation and successful completion of any recommen treatment an ev •n ir must be approved by the Department of Corrections; full payment of the costs of investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department; and may apply for early termination of probation after 3 years if there are no violations and all conditions have been successfully completed. This offer of settlement shall cover all the allegations against your client investigated by the Palm Beach Police Department in case number 05-000368. LB/lb Please confirm acceptance in writing as soon as possible to 561-355-7302. 09/12/2019 Since¢ely LA NA BELO Assistant State Attorney 101 N. Dixie Higtmay, Wm Palm Back Honda 331014209 (561) 355.7100 CONFIalg5ENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet 19-411 SD NY_GM_00330913 EFTA_00203639 EFTA02729079

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.