EFTA02729701

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 11

Reference

efta-02729701

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

calOPP-02affliPc14,00 Document 305-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/90741709 PPste 1 of 2 Prose Court Reporting Agency, Inc One 0leariake Centre 260 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1600 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (601) 832-7600 Phone (681) 832-7508 Fax Tax ID: 28-3892W www.proseortoofn September 17, 2009 Robert Griffon, Esquire Burman, °Fitton, Luther & Coleman - WPB 903 Banyan Boulevard SAO 400 West Palm Beech, FL 33401 Re: Jam Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein 9-18-09 Scheduled Deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 Statement for Record Description of Services Repo App HT- 1st Hr Appearance 1 st Hr Depo Trans 061-Reg Transcript Pages • 8 E-Transorlpt Smelled canomentery Invokie Number CH 411 110.00 28.80 Immol0e total: $13820 Thank you for choosing Prose Court Reporting Agency, Inc. Payment is due upon receipt 09112/2019 EXHIBIT f P CONFIDE CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331991 EFTA 00204717 EFTA02729701 d1490V8-41949131 q 01f)tifi 655B3096dument 305-10 &Med on FLSD Docket 0947/M9 "Pabeegfoi22 VLSUAL EVIDENCE P.O. Sax 047 Weis Pee bath. 0% 2140$ BURMAN, CRITTON A LUTIIER ROBERT CRITTON 303 BANYAN BLVD SUITE 400 West PALM BEACH, FL 33401 Dec. Can / References Invoice 9/17/20091 28616 Data Number Terms Due on receipt 2ANII DOE as v EPSTEIN Sam/ • Rendered ANIONS 9/16/2009 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OP: JANE DOE I 4 Tech Time • 1ST 2 Hours 275.00 ocitai Tape S c toS 1 15.00 MASTER TAPE CONSISTS OP DISCLESIONS BEMEEti ATTORAEYS PRIOR TO SWEARING IN REGARDING CANCELLATION OF DEPO. 9/17/2009 Delivery I 0.00 MASTER TAPES FORWARDED PER YOUR REQUEST. ICI COPIES HAVE RBI MADE OR KEPT ON FILE AT VISUAL EVIDENCE SHOULD COPIES BE REQUIRED IN THE WIRE PLEASE FORWARD MASTER TAPES TO OUR oPPILE POR DUPLICATION. THANK YOU. MORE THAN JUST VIDEO I See ALL available prilMottation technology services at www.vlsualevidana.org, 09/12/2019 TOTAL: $290.00 Ronk to: P.O. Box 6967 West Palm Oath, FL 33405 Tax ID * 59-2476539 Phone: (561) 655-2055 Pet (661)655-2896 08526Meuelervidenoearg P CONFIDE CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDNY_GM_00331992 EFTA_002047 IS EFTA02729702

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 324 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2015 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER DENYING PETITIONERS' MOTION TO JOIN UNDER RULE 21 AND MOTION TO AMEND UNDER RULE 15 This cause is before the Court on Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4's Corrected Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action ("Rule 21 Motion") (DE 280), and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Protective Motion Pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend Their Pleadings to Conform to Existing Evidence and to Add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as Petitioners ("Rule 15 Motion") (DE 311). Both motions are ripe for review. For the following reasons, the Court concludes that they should be denied. I. Background This is an action by two unnamed petitioners, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, seeking to prosecute a claim under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 377

10p

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown