Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02729711DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02729711

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02729711
Pages
5
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
I 11 I 1 f' . a I [1 U U U U U U U IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO. PALM BEACH COUNTY Petitioner, L.T. CASE NO. 2008 CF 009381A v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. APPENDIX TO EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND EMERGENCY MOTION TO REVIEW DENIAL OF STAY ROBERT D. CRITTON BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 842-2820 and JACK A. GOLDBERGER ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 659-8300 and JANE KREUSLER-WALSH and BARBARA J. COMPIANI of KREUSLER-WALSH, COMPIANI & VARGAS, P.A. 501 South Flagler Drive, Suite 503 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5913 (561) 659-5455 janewalsh(4ikwna.com Counsel for Petitioner 09/12/2019 Page 3983 Agency to Agency Requet 19-411 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00332001 EFTA_00204727 EFTA02729711 U U U U U CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00332002 EFTA_00204728 EFTA02729712 Document Tab Proceedings in Southern District Court Victim's (Doe) Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Right Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 Judge Marra's Order to Compel Production and Protective Order (8/21/08) Victims' (Doe #1 and Doe #2) Motion to Unseal Non- Prosecution Agreement (9/25/08) A-1 A-2 A-3 Respondent's (U.S. Attorney's Office) Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement (10/8/08) A-4 Victims' (Doe #1 and Doe #2) Reply to Respondent's A-5 Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement (10/16/08) Judge Marra's Order Denying Petitioners' (Doe #1 and Doe 42). Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement (2/12/08 [sic should be 2/12/09]) A-6 Proceedings in 15th Judicial Circuit Transcript of Epstein's Plea Conference (6/30/08) A-7 Epstein's Plea (6/30/08) A-8 Agreed Order Sealing Document in Court File (7/2/08) A-9 NonParty E.W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records A-10 And Unseal Records (5/12/09) Palm Beach Post's Motion to Intervene and Petition for A-11 Access (6/1/09) Applicant, B.B.'s Motion to Intervene and Supporting A-12 Memorandum of Law (6/11/09) 09112/2019 CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00332003 EFTA_00204729 EFTA02729713 I Document Tab Epstein's Motion to Make Court Records Confidential (6/11/09) A-13 Epstein's Motion to Stay Disclosure of the Non-Prosecution A-14 Agreement and Addendum Pending Review (6/25/09) Intervener's [B.B.] Response to Motion to Stay and Supporting Memorandum of Law (6/26/09) A-15 ti J j Order of Judge Jeffrey J. Colbath granting motions to unseal (6/25/09) Order of Judge Jeffrey J. Colbath denying motion to stay (6/26/09) Transcript on non-parties' motions to unseal and Epstein's motion for confidentiality (6/25/09) Transcript on Epstein's motion to stay (6/26/09) 09112/2019 CONFPITTENTIAL A-16 A-17 A-18 A-19 Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDNY_GM_00332004 EFTA_00204730 EFTA02729714 11 U U U U CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00332005 EFTA_00204731 EFTA02729715

Technical Artifacts (10)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domain4ikwna.com
Phone(561) 659-5455
Phone(561) 659-8300
Phone(561) 842-2820
Phone2729711
Phone2729712
Phone2729713
Phone2729714
Phone2729715
Phone401-5913

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02729648

53p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, makes its Initial Disclosures, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A), and state: Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A)fil: 1. R. Alexander Acosta Dean, School of Law Florida International University Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall 11200 S.W. 8'h Street Miami, Florida 33199 (305) 348-1118 Dean Acosta was the United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened in the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the non-prosecution agreement was negotiated. 2. was the First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened, and the non-prosecution agreement was negot

10p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01387839

1p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. VICTIM'S MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT COMES NOW the Petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, by and through their undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 ("CVRA"), and file this motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement that has been provided to their attorneys under seal in this case. The agreement should be unsealed because no good cause exists for sealing it. Moreover, the Government has inaccurately described the agreement in its publicly-filed pleadings, creating a false impression that the agreement protects the victims. Finally, the agreement should be unsealed to facilitate consultation by victims' counsel with others involved who have

8p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.