Case File
efta-efta00011142DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceEFTA00011142
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00011142
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Subject: Notes from 2020.11.19 Call with Sternheim, Everdell, and Cohen
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 19:33:56 +0000
2020.11.19 Call with
• Cohen: two things want to discuss; recent developments related to conditions in MDC; renewed bail application
planning to make
• Sternheim: recent conditions are that yesterday she was whisked out of area she spends the day in; she asked what
was going on; said they were giving her a test; she wanted to speak to her lawyers before the test; she was told if
she did not take the test, she would be put in SHU for 21 days; if she did take the test, would be in SHU for 14
days; then given 2 COVID tests; appears that staff near her had COVID/was coughing; heard other guard say heard
that has COVID; she is in her isolation cell; every time open hatch, they spray it so chemicals are in her area; big
issue is that they repeatedly search her (strip search, wand); after search, get up close and personal and look in
her mouth (invitation to infection);
o When got her laptop today, it was out of power, had to wait for power cord; environment where can't work;
has to balance pad
o Only reason would get sick it's because of BOP staff; my understanding is that rigid conditions under which
detained (and haven't seen ever before, not even Tartaglione) — if that's because of Epstein, she will get
sick on BOP's watch, will create another nightmare for the Government
o Never had clients for terrorism, violence, murder treated the way GM is treated
• Cohen: over 100 years of experience in this district collectively; never seen anything like this before; would like to
see you in person ideally next week or at least by Zoom
o Want to walk you through the renewed bail application have spent 3.5 months putting substantial work
into; believe it addresses concerns Government raised at the hearing and in submissions; believe it
addresses concerns raised by the Court
o Would need same level of confidentiality described in the protective order (financial information; personal,
private information; suretor information); want to make sure covered by protective order
o Related request is that when we file, which we feel we have to do soon, if GM remains in, it will likely be the
first of many calls in light of current COVID situation; would need to file under seal and would like your
consent as well
o Show real evidence of threats to her and family members and those close to her
• M: really appreciate you coming to us with concerns about conditions of confinement and opening dialogue about
bail application; in terms of bail application, we are happy to listen and take a look at what you have, will go in
with an open mind, but can't at this stage preview or predict what our position will be. In terms of how to treat
information you share with us on Monday and sealing, would have to run up the chain; would prefer to do by
video
• M: able to tell us about what kinds of activities or dissemination concerns you have;
• Cohen: if thought covered by PO, not sure that covered by PO; asking to have things treated as if designated
confidential under the order
• Everdell: in order to describe what our proposed bail package is, going to have discuss info that is confidential and
sensitive, including for potential co-signers; includes their properties, financial information
• Cohen: understand that everything needs to be made known to gov't, pretrial, and court, but beyond that
• M: want us to treat any information provided to us as if marked confidential under PO?
EFTA00011142
• Everdell: could only use for purposes of bail application; would not publicly disseminate or disclose; would only be
shared with prosecution team; individuals looking to come forward are nervous b/c of notoriety of the case; want
to give comfort that what telling at meeting will be treated confidentiality and won't be disclosed
•
in evaluating potential bail application, for financial information, might contact bank or vet that information;
sometimes take steps to vet cosigners as well; would restrictions prohibit us from doing that
• Everdell: for purposes of meeting, want to describe potential co-signers and what security of bond would look like
and discuss certain financial information (most financial information are things already in discovery itself, so some
of materials already marked confidential); understand will need to vet co-signers
• Cohen: keep confidential for Monday's purposes and then to extent team needs to vet people, we can work through
that
•
in terms of conditions of confinement, still trying to understand everything that has happened in last 24
hours;
o Understand that one of staff members on detail who works in area where client is housed tested positive for
COVID; understand that everyone who works in that area was sent home to quarantine; rapid test came
back negative; sending lab test out; will need to stay in quarantine for 14 days, will test out; during that
time she needs to stay in isolation cell; was not aware that searching her the way you described while in
quarantine; will reach out to MDC and discuss balancing need for security with disease
o Understanding is she will still have 3 hours a day to make legal calls; have made request to MDC legal that is
going up to warden that she be able to review laptop for 13 hours that she was supposed to be in the day
room; will inquire about a writing surface, whether possible to put something into her cell to make review
of discovery more practical or move her to somewhere with that kind of furniture; understand that
temperate is ; understand no issues with moistness
• Sternheim: anytime anything is given to her, open hatch; every time it is opened and closed it is sprayed; chemical of
spray goes into the room where there is no other ventilation; she also has no hot water, soap; not able to self-
protect under the conditions
• MI: will focus on the conditions while she will be in quarantine
• Sternheim: legal calls being done in close proximity to people who are watching her; I could hear people when I was
on call with them; was told notetaking was occurring; she is in between 1 to 4 feet distance from these people
• MI: will follow up
• Everdell: CD that sent with most recent production, can't review that on laptop
• MI: if want us to load hard drive with just that, can do that; or wait until have hard drive loaded
• Everdell: will get back to you
•
concerns that expressed before quarantine are mostly on level of searches and surveillance
• Sternheim: she is practically in solitary confinement; when I visit her, there are at least 3 people watching us with a
camera; I have asked what camera is for; they say it is not recording; then why is it always set up and moved when
they moved us; degree of invasiveness of attorney-client relationship which have not experienced before; she
doesn't even have a regular toothbrush; it's one inch
• Cohen: have had same experience with camera; when allowed to see her, not allowed to pass her documents
• U: have had multiple conversations with MDC about that
• Sternheim: in most recent visit, was able to hand her something to look at; have put us in a room that's very tight;
never seen anything like this
• U: client has more access to discovery and more time to review discovery than any other inmate; more time for
calls as well
• Sternheim: that may be true; however, whatever is being done to her to prevent what had happened to Epstein, she
is being worn down; mentally healthy person; her hair is falling out
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
One St. Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
EFTA00011143
Te
EFTA00011144
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01481978
0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00020322
0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00017813
0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00031332
0p
Court UnsealedJan 27, 2015
Exhibit 16 Epstein
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40 EXHIBIT 16 Case Page 2 of I I Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts Case sass Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT individually, and BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the
40p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00030035
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.