EFTA00011147

From: (USANYS)" ci To: Cc: a' (USAIsloYall> )11 Subject: Re: Epstein Sharing Order Part II Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:05:59 +0000 Yes, I think we should. Thanks for flagging. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 29, 2020, at 3:56 PM, > wrote: M, is it the intent to share those? If so, I'll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it's unnecessary. I don't think those are substantive dots but I defer. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II (USANYS) Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I'm not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be From: Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II >; (USANYS) Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we've received, with just a note that it doesn't appear to include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added. thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40 To: (USANYS) < Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II < M> MI— I've updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received. Would you take a look when you can? EFTA00011147 - I've tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks. Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I've accurately described/characterized the new stuff we're looking to share? Thanks, EFTA00011148