EFTA00014154
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
Deposition excerpt shows heated exchange among attorneys with no substantive allegations
The passage is a routine courtroom deposition transcript featuring lawyers arguing over procedure. It contains no names of influential actors, no financial or misconduct details, and offers no actiona The excerpt records a dispute between attorneys (Mr. Tein, Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Leopold) about taking No mention of any high‑profile individuals, agencies, or controversial actions. The content is pro
House Oversight hearing excerpt reveals possible undisclosed cell phone evidence and questions about financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein
The passage hints that a cell phone, potentially containing incriminating data, was handed to Michelle Pagan and not returned, and raises the question of how much money a witness hopes to receive from Witness gave a cell phone to Michelle Pagan several years ago and has not recovered it. The cell phone could contain communications relevant to ongoing investigations. The line of questioning probes
Incoherent Deposition Transcript with Casual Text Message Reference
The excerpt contains fragmented dialogue from a deposition and a personal text message with no clear connection to any influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct. It lacks specific name Deposition includes vague references to a serious testimony but no substantive content. A casual text message mentions MySpace and personal affection, unrelated to any official matter. No high‑profil
Testimony on alleged underage relationship involving Palm Beach firefighter Brett
The passage provides a vague courtroom exchange about a possible underage sexual relationship involving a local firefighter. It lacks concrete names beyond the firefighter, no financial or political c Witness questioned about a 22‑year‑old Palm Beach firefighter named Brett dating an underage girl. Questions focus on whether the fire department or police were aware of the relationship. No specific
Transcript excerpt from House Oversight deposition showing heated exchange over exhibit handling
The passage records a minor procedural dispute in a deposition with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers little investigative value beyond confirming normal courtroom Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of misrepresenting the record. Dispute over labeling and copying of exhibits. Witness expresses willingness to disagree professionally.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.