EFTA00015277

From: To: (USANYS)" (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:54:46 +0000 Attachments: Ex._H_Sealed.pdf Here it is — Ex H. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 3:45 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing And can you send me MJ Netbum's decision? Exhibit Ito the def motion, I think From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:58 AM To: (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re A1N/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented the plaintiff in the civil action. The two letters we submitted in connection with our All Writs Application are attached. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:53 AM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Another Q: who's Stan Pottinger? From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:53 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS)<Mal> Subject: RE: Question re A1N/Maxwell Suppression Hearing From: ( USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:40 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) ‹ > Subject: RE: Question re A1N/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Can I see our original application to Judge Sweet? And I assume there was no transcript before Judge S? EFTA00015277 From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:45 PM To: (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing In the spirit of completeness, I'm also attaching their replies. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:20 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) >; Subject: Re: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing ire Goodness! Associate U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York On Jun 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM, (USANYS) < (USANYS) < (USANYS) < wrote: She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court's page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that over the last few years. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:25 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Dumb Q: why does Maxwell have two memos of law? From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:19 PM To: (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing (USANYS) < (USANYS) < Per our discussion, I am attaching: (1) Maxwell's two briefs raising the suppression argument; (2) the transcript of the McMahon proceedings and her opinion (Ex D, E, G); (3) our brief (see pp 59-115); and (4) the exhibits we attached to our motion (Ex 4-7). Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions "at a later time" ahead of trial. Thanks very much. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 10:09 AM To: (USANYS) EFTA00015278 Cc: (USANYS) ; Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing (USANYS) < Sure, set a time other than 2:00. I'm in the office. Or Webex From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:11 AM To: (USANTS) < Cc: I (USANYS) ; (USANYS) < Subject: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing Hi=, We had an issue come up related to the upcoming suppression hearing (no date set yet, although we expect one) related to that we'd like your thoughts on. Let us know a convenient time to stop by over the next few days, thanks. Chief, Public Corruption Unit U.S. Attorney's Office Southern District of New York EFTA00015279