Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00016822DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00016822

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00016822
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From (USANYS). < IMIN' To: (USANYS)" Subject: DAILY BEAST: Prince Andrew: I'm Ready to Talk. The FBI Never Asked. Feds: Oh Yes, We Did Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 18:24:46 +0000 Prince Andrew and the FBI were involved in a furious war of words Tuesday, after he denied claims made by the U.S. attorney for Manhattan, Geoffrey Berman, that he has refused to cooperate with American authorities investigating Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual abuse. Andrew said no request had been received, and he was ready to talk. However a spokesperson for Berman's office told The Daily Beast they stood by the prosecutor's comments, EFTA00016822 specifically the claim that they had "made several attempts to contact" Andrew's representatives. Andrew, 59, however, was said to be "angry and bewildered," according to The Daily 'I gILaO, at allegations made by Berman. On Monday, Berman called out Andrew for giving "zero co-operation" to the investigation into Epstein at a press conference held outside Epstein's infamous front door. EFTA00016823 "Nothing could be further from the truth," a source described as "close to" Andrew told The Telegraph, "The Duke is more than happy to talk to the FBI but he hasn't been approached by them yet. "He is angry about the way this is being portrayed and bewildered as to why this was said in New York. It seems certain people are jumping the gun." However law-enforcement sources were adamant that EFTA00016824 they "stood by" Berman's remarks. Berman said he was taking the rare step of calling Andrew out by name because Andrew himself, in his disastrous Newsnight interview, had said: "I am willing to help any appropriate law-enforcement agency with their investigations, if required." While many observers saw Berman's remarks as a desperate (and likely unsuccessful) attempt to shame Prince Andrew into living up to his earlier vow, Duncan Levin, a former federal and New York state prosecutor in the Manhattan DA's office, saw something else: evidence of the authorities' determination to leave no EFTA00016825 stone unturned as they go after the rich and powerful global network which Epstein cultivated. Levin, who is now a managing partner at Tucker Levin, PLLC, told The Daily Beast that while it was "highly unusual for a prosecutor to make a public statement about a witness's reluctance to cooperate with law enforcement" there is "nothing usual about this case, in any way. Prince Andrew is not your typical witness, by any stretch of the imagination." Public Affairs United States Department of Justice U.S. Attorney's Office [Southern District of New York Mobile I Press Office: (212) 637-1020 EFTA00016826

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(212) 637-1020

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Fwd: (SBU/DP) Urgent Guidance for DOJ: MLAT to Question Prince Andrew

From: To: Subject: Fwd: (SBU/DP) Urgent Guidance for DOJ: MLAT to Question Prince Andrew Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 17:22:56 +0000 Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: ' Date: June 8, 2020 at 1:18:24 PM EDT To: Cc: " , EUR-Press <EUR-Press-DL Subject: RE: (SBU/DP) Urgent Guidance for DOW NILAT to Questio❑ Prince Andrew Embassy London team, Prince Andrew's legal team issued a statement earlier today criticizing DOJ for how we have treated him during the Jeffrey Epstein probe. They claim that he has offered to help with the Department of Justice's Jeffrey Epstein investigation on "at least three occasions this year and has not been taken up, also that details have been erroneously briefed by the DOJ "in breach of its own rules of confidentiality" that he is non-cooperative when he is seeking to cooperate. He accuses the DOJ of "perhaps seeking publicity rather than accepting the assistance." Also, his lawyers claim that two statements by U.S Attorney Geoffrey

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020

SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020 SDNY News Clips Thursday, January 30, 2020 Contents Public Corruption 2 Avenatti 2 Epstein 4 Pamas 8 Terrorism and International Narcotics 9 Virgil Griffith 9 White Plains 10 Grogg 10 Matters of Interest 11 Weinstein 11 Bolton 14 1 EFTA00095967 SDNY News Clips, Thursday, January 30, 2020 Public Corruption Avenatti Avenatti didn't care about ruining teens' lives in Nike case, lawyer says NY Post By Ruth Weissmann 1/30/2020 Lightning-rod lawyer Michael Avenatti was allegedly so hellbent on extorting an eight-figure sum from Nike that he didn't care who got hurt — including teenage basketball players, a witness testified Thursday. In his second day of testimony in Manhattan federal court, Nike attorney Scott Wilson recounted the "Twilight Zone" meetings in which Avenatti allegedly tried to extort the company for $20 million under threat of exposing purported corruption in youth basketball linked to the athl

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00023804

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct

5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct JcereY Epsteh - Wildpedla Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.1io61 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.E•g-91 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.1139-) All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court' ll Epstein made many art-pl-atirt r s_ettlements with alleged victims.W23 - - - _ E_XCAt "-Vet 5sE RItACt PnOi- CiOR °NICER • - 40L'aritfrieerPROS1 1701-i0.Ni o> SIE•us) i1/44".,e036( C ; Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, November 30, 2018. Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014)*SC7ck%A L. ne,OSC Rt p Rom N)Eiszci poS IT c"),3 A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Vi

32p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.