Case File
efta-efta00018833DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceEFTA00018833
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00018833
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: Cite-checked omnibus MOL
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:04:05 +0000
Attachments: 2021.02.26_GM_Omnibus_Opposition_to_Defense_Motions.rd.docx
Team, truly excellent work on this.
and I split up our review, so I took pages 3-116 of the motion
sections), ands reviewing the rest. Two items to note — I tried to change subsequent cites to string cites where
caught them, but I wasn't reviewing closely for that, so make sure the paras are reviewing for that. Second, as I discussed
with-please take a look at the redactions in her section. I tried to conform them to the general principal that
redactions should apply to the subpoena and the ex parte proceeding, and un-redactions should apply to the description
of the article, her brief making general allegations, and our indictment. If that's not how you are envisioning the
redactions, happy to discuss.
Again, fantastic work. This is a very strong brief.
From:
Sent: Frida , Februar 26, 2021 4:08 AM
To
Cc
Subject: Cite-checked omnibus M0L
Attached please find the cite-checked omnibus memorandum of law in opposition to Maxwell's motions. The team will be
working with the paralegals tomorrow to proofread (which will include cleaning up the TOA), get out the discovery that
we reference in the MOL, and deal with redactions before filing. You'll see that we have highlighted portions that we
tentatively expect to redact in
Thanks,
EFTA00018833
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.