Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00019028DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00019028

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00019028
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: " To: 'a" aMIE> Subject: RE: Judge Rules on Redactions to Filing in Ghislaine Maxwell Case Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 02:22:47 +0000 Haha, so ridiculous! I'm assuming AJN didn't realize that those portions are in our indictment. But if she wants them redacted, that's fine. Ori inal Messa e From: alMIN> Sent: Thursda March 18, 2021 10:21 PM To: aNIMI.> Subject: RE: Judge Rules on Redactions to Filing in Ghislaine Maxwell Case Thanks! Saw on the Google alert. (The "sensational and impure" details are the sentences in our indictment...) Original Messa e From: aNIMIN> Sent: Thursda March 18, 2021 10:20 PM To: alMIN> Subject: FW: Judge Rules on Redactions to Filing in Ghislaine Maxwell Case FYI Original Messa e From: (USANYS) alMIN> Sent: Thursday,March 18, 2021 9:42 PM To: SANYS) Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] Subject: Judge Rules on Redactions to Filing in Ghislaine Maxwell Case https://lawandcrime.cornthigh-profile/judge-rules-some-ghislaine-maxwell-details-are-too-sensational-and- impure-to-be-revealed-to-the-public/ Sent from my iPhone EFTA00019028

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttps://lawandcrime.cornthigh-profile/judge-rules-some-ghislaine-maxwell-details-are-too-sensational-and

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.