Case File
efta-efta00019658DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceEFTA00019658
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00019658
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: Epstein
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:38:55 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: Plaintiffs_Motion_08_Civ_80736.pdf
Here's the motion for summary judgment, for example.
Original Messa e
Sent: Friday. November 30.2018 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: Epstein
Thanks. And in either the state or federal action, has there been motion practice in which deposition transcripts
have been filed? Motion for summary judgement, for example?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 30, 2018, at 9:28 AM,
wrote:
> It's in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. It's not the lawsuit the victims filed against the government to
invalidate the NPA. And it's not one of the suits the victims filed against Epstein. It's a lawsuit that an attorney
who represented multiple victims filed against Epstein for malicious prosecution. Sort of a complicated
background: previously Epstein sued the lawyer, claiming that the lawyer was involved in an unrelated fraud that
the lawyer's law partner was convicted of-- the fraud related to an Epstein business. The lawyer is now suing
Epstein for malicious prosecution, claiming that he wrongfully filed the old lawsuit in retaliation for representing
Epstein's victims.
>
Original Messa e
> u ject: pstein
> The December 4 trial - is that the one against DOJ or against Epstein? State or federal court?
> Sent from my iPhone
EFTA00019658
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.