Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00019658DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00019658

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00019658
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:38:55 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Plaintiffs_Motion_08_Civ_80736.pdf Here's the motion for summary judgment, for example. Original Messa e Sent: Friday. November 30.2018 9:33 AM Subject: Re: Epstein Thanks. And in either the state or federal action, has there been motion practice in which deposition transcripts have been filed? Motion for summary judgement, for example? Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 30, 2018, at 9:28 AM, wrote: > It's in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. It's not the lawsuit the victims filed against the government to invalidate the NPA. And it's not one of the suits the victims filed against Epstein. It's a lawsuit that an attorney who represented multiple victims filed against Epstein for malicious prosecution. Sort of a complicated background: previously Epstein sued the lawyer, claiming that the lawyer was involved in an unrelated fraud that the lawyer's law partner was convicted of-- the fraud related to an Epstein business. The lawyer is now suing Epstein for malicious prosecution, claiming that he wrongfully filed the old lawsuit in retaliation for representing Epstein's victims. > Original Messa e > u ject: pstein > The December 4 trial - is that the one against DOJ or against Epstein? State or federal court? > Sent from my iPhone EFTA00019658

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.