Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00019885DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00019885

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00019885
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "- To: "Berman Geoffre (USANYS)" c SANYS " Cc: ' (USANYS)" c Subject: FW: DOJ ongoing Investigation. Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:32:18 +0000 Inline-Images: image543915.jpg; image517195.jpg "Strauss Audre SANYS " From: Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 12:17 PM To: (USANYS) (USANYS) < Cc: Subject: FW: Dal ongoing Investigation. FYI From: Gary Sloxsome Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 12:00 To: >; Daniel Cundy Jennifer Richardson *c > Subject: DOJ ongoing Investigation. Dear IM We and the Duke of York set out to assist your investigation when the DOJ asked for his help in January 2020. However, we regret to say that we have reached the conclusion that the DOJ's dealings with the Duke of York have not been designed to seek his assistance in investigating and prosecuting the targets of the investigation but instead have been used only to gather publicity for Mr Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. It is essential, if justice is to be done for Epstein's victims, that a proper and thorough criminal investigation is carried out. Although the public record indicates your office (SDNY) has been actively investigating Mr. Epstein and other targets for more than 2 years, the first time you ever attempted to make contact and request The Duke of York's help was on 2 January 2020. The Duke instructed my firm to make contact with you pertaining to this request. When we made contact, you confirmed that the Duke of York was not and is not a target of the US criminal investigation. EFTA00019885 Due to the publicity surrounding the investigation, we asked you to confirm that our discussions and any interview arrangements would remain confidential, in accordance with your rules. The Duke did not want to add to the media circus that has now surrounded the investigation. On 10 January 2020 you confirmed that any arrangements would indeed be kept confidential. We indicated that we would refer back to you once we had dealt with the various issues and procedures, which would need to be addressed to enable the Duke to cooperate to the fullest extent possible, including the need to obtain all the information that you might need to consider. It was at that time that we informed you, by email dated 20 January, that such preliminary issues would be dealt with within 14 days. It was also in that email that we confirmed that The Duke has a strong desire to cooperate with the ongoing investigation by the DOJ. Instead of waiting to hear from us (as you indicated on 22 January 2020), Mr Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, chose to make a public statement about the Duke on 27 January 2020. This led to press reports that there had been "a wall of silence" and that there had been "zero co- operation" by the Duke. These statements were not true. They should not have been made. Quite apart from your promise of confidentiality, in England it would not be thought to be in the interests of justice for any prosecutor or investigator to make public statements about witnesses who may be willing, in confidence, to assist their investigation. In England, prosecutors and investigators try to make sure that the investigation and trial of serious criminal cases take place in court and not in press conferences or publicity battles. When we complained about the way the Duke (and we) had been treated by the DOJ, you refused to apologise and you have now also gone back on your promise that any arrangements for the interview will be confidential. We cannot advise the Duke to speak to prosecutors who cannot be trusted to deal with him fairly nor to treat what he says or does confidentially. He has reluctantly accepted our advice that, in those circumstances, there is no purpose to be served in continuing to try to assist further. Finally we have no wish to engage in any further publicity battle about the DOJ's conduct and for that reason we ask that you treat this email as private and confidential. Regards Gary Gary Bloxsome I Partner Blackfords LLP 115 Old Bailey I London I EC4M 7EF DX 161400 Old Bailey 5 1 020 3427 3343 I www.blackfords.com EFTA00019886 $ RANKED IN • Chambers fo % UK 4P0 2020 e lavdIn WS op TIER 2020 Blackfords RP is a limited liability partnership registered in England & Wales with registered number OC325398 at Hill House, 1 Mint Walk, Croydon, CRO 1EA. A list of members' names is available at this address. GOPR: details of how we handle personal data can be found in our Privacy Statement Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 462078. EFTA00019887

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014638

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00017042

0p
OtherUnknown

Display Name

Display Name Email UUID 6ICE9350-0B4F-0000-AB39-E8Of'2A59A443 Distribution 'I've TO Recipient Type SysternGroupMember Recipient Display Name Email IRA D 9D77B2D0-19C1-0000-A9894Y2C00000S8D0 Distribution Type TO Recipient Tvpc SystemGroupkkmber Recipient Display Name Email _ U LID 4237CDC0-1407-0000-AF20-8402120084D2 Distribution Type TO Recipient Type _Recipient Display Name a Email UUID 66E64C10-1320-0000-8ECI-2F2162868DCC Distribution Type TO Recipient Txpe SystemGroupMember Expire 0 Delay delivers until 0 Delegated fake Archived fake Read fake Deleted fake Opened fake Completed fake Security Normal Box type Inbox Return notification hen opened fake Return notification "hen deleted fake Return notification when completed fake Return notification %%hen declined fake Return notification "hen accepted false Archive S'en ion 5.3 Internal ID 5D4F0066.NYMDOMLNYMADMI.100.16B6F30.1.F EAE. [email protected] LNY MADM 1.103.0.1.0.141

1000p
OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
Court UnsealedAug 19, 2019

Letter Motion

Letter Motion, USA v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug 19, 2019)

3p
OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Thursday, Feb. 22, 2019

From: To: Cc: Bee: Subject: SDNY News Clips Thursday, Feb. 22, 2019 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 21:38:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_2-22_NewsClips.pdf SDNY News Clips Friday, February 22, 2019 EFTA00064994 Contents Public Corrupt) Ulrich Manafort Mueller Inauguration Committee R. Kelly General Crimes Okoumou Civil Division NYCHA Civil Frauds FEMA Matters of Interest Judge rules DOJ violated the law by failing to confer with victims of Jeffrey Epstein The Lawyers Who Did Not Break New Attorney General in Hot Seat as Mueller Report Nears Public Corruption Ulrich Teamsters ex-vice president took bribes from health plan administrator: feds Daily News By Stephen Rex Brown 2/21/19 His future's on the rocks. The ex-vice president of a Teamsters union that reps beverage industry workers took tens of thousands of dollars in bribes from a health plan administrator, federal prosecutors charged Thursday. John Ulrich, who served as the vice president

28p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.