Case File
efta-efta00020090DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceEFTA00020090
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00020090
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
PANISH
SHEA &
BOYLE,
June 8, 2020
VIA E-MAIL AND FEDEX
The Honorable Geoffrey S. Berman
United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
c/o
Assistant
nited tates Attorne
E-mail:
Re:
Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request)
Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF
Dear Mr.
Please be advised that we represent the plaintiff in the above-referenced litigation who is
hereby submitting this written request for documentary and tangible evidence relating to the U.S.
Government's investigation concerning Jeffrey E. Epstein's repeated acts of sexual abuse against
our client, Jane Doe.' See United States a rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). We
believe that such evidence is currently in the possession, custody and control of the Department
of Justice ("DOJ") and are highly relevant to Doe's above-referenced civil matter.
This written request is submitted pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq., known
colloquially as the "Touhy" regulations. Because this request is directed to DOJ employees,
compliance is subject to the Touhy process, and for that reason we have not affected formal
service of process and hope that it will be unnecessary.
Summary of Information Sought and its Relevance to the Proceeding
Doe's civil case arises out of years of sexual abuse and exploitation by notorious
pedophile and convicted sex offender Jeffrey E. Epstein. It all started in 1994 when 13-year-old
Doe met Epstein at a summer camp in Michigan. Doe was Epstein's first known victim and was
To protect her anonymity, our client has elected to file her action as a Jane Doe and will be
referred to simply as "Doe" in this letter. The prosecutors handling the Epstein case and any and
all related ongoing investigations in your office, however, are aware of our client's true identity.
11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700 • Los Angeles, California 90025 • 310.477.1700 phone • 310.477.1699 fax • www.psblaw.com
EFTA00020090
The Honorable Geoffrey S. Berman
United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
c/o
Assistant United States Attorney
June 8, 2020
Page 2
PANISH
SHEA &
BOYLE, ,,
subsequently abused by Epstein for years as a young girl, suffering unimaginable physical and
psychological trauma and distress.
The United States ultimately investigated and brought charges against Jeffrey E. Epstein
for sexual abuse of minors and violations of federal law. We believe the government's
investigation spanned several years and collected copious amounts of information and
documents regarding Jeffrey E. Epstein and his victims, including Doe.
As summarized below, we request the production of documentary and tangible evidence
relating to Doe which was obtained during the government's investigation of Epstein and that is
currently in the government's possession. This evidence is highly relevant to Doe's civil case as
it will likely provide information regarding Epstein's liability and Doe's significant damages.
Specifically, we seek copies of the following documents currently in the possession of the
government:
1.
All photographs of Doe
2.
All flight logs stating Doe's name
3.
All videos of Doe
4.
All correspondences between Epstein and his agents, employees and/or attorneys
and Doe
5.
All records of purchases of airline tickets on behalf of Doe
6.
Jeffrey E. Epstein's Trust Agreement of The 1953 Trust dated August 8, 2019
7.
Jeffrey E. Epstein's Epstein's 1953 Trust
8.
Any and all other documentary materials relating in any way to Doe
Disclosure is \\ di-ranted Under 28 C.F.R. & 16.26
Pursuant to the DOJ's Torthy regulations, the Deputy or Associate Attorney General
assesses the following considerations in determining whether disclosure is warranted:
EFTA00020091
The Honorable Geoffrey S. Berman
United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
c/o
Assistant United States Attorney
June 8, 2020
Page 3
PANISH
SHEA &
BOYLE, ,,
(a)(1) Whether such disclosure is appropriate under the rules of procedure governing the
case or mater in which the demand arose;
(a)(2) Whether disclosure is appropriate under the relevant substantive law of privilege.
This request satisfies both of these considerations. As explained previously, the requested
non-privileged documentary evidence directly concerns the allegations in Doe's civil case.
Additionally, DOD's Toithy regulations prohibit disclosure, subject to certain exceptions,
if any of the following factors exist:
(b)(1) Disclosure would violate a statute, such as the income tax laws, 26 U.S.C.A. 6103
and 7213, or a rule of procedure, such as the grand jury secrecy rule, F.R.Cr.P., Rule 6(e),
(b)(2) Disclosure would violate a specific regulation;
(b)(3) Disclosure would reveal classified information, unless appropriately declassified
by the originating agency,
(b)(4) Disclosure would reveal a confidential source or informant, unless the investigative
agency and the source or informant have no objection,
(b)(5) Disclosure would reveal investigatory records compiled for law enforcement
purposes, and would interfere with enforcement proceedings or disclose investigative techniques
and procedures the effectiveness of which would thereby be impaired,
(b)(6) Disclosure would improperly reveal trade secrets without the owner's consent.
This request does not implicate any of the above considerations. The requested
information is within the scope of ordinary subpoena practice and does not seek disclosure of
information prohibited by statute or regulation, nor information that is classified or that would
reveal the source of an informant.
To the extent any of Doe's requests seek the investigatory records compiled for law
enforcement purposes, Doe does not request investigatory records that would interfere with
ongoing enforcement proceedings.
Expedited Response
EFTA00020092
The Honorable Geoffrey S. Berman
United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
c/o
Assistant United States Attorney
June 8, 2020
Page 4
PANISH
SHEA &
BOYLE, ,,
Doe's civil case is actively being litigated and the parties have already requested and
exchanged initial discovery. Moreover, a victim compensation fund has been recently
established that Doe may elect to participate in. Accordingly, Doe respectfully requests that the
DOJ expedite the production of these requested documents to assist her obtain long-awaited
justice for the atrocities committed against her.
Very truly yours,
PANISH SHEA & BOYLE
C96 6
1/2 0•"•
Robert S. Glassman
Attorney for Jane Doe
cc:
EFTA00020093
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00018466
0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00018441
0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00019101
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01654937
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01654937
18p
Dept. of JusticeFeb 3, 2026
Epstein draft indictment
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No: 18 U.S.C. § 371 18 U.S.C. § 2423(e) 18 U.S.C. § 2423(d) 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(2) 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(1) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, a/k/a and Defendants. INDICTMENT The Grand Jury charges that: BACKGROUND At all times relevant to this Indictment: I. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN employed defendants , a/k/a " and to perform, among other things, services as p
56p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.