Case File
efta-efta00021937DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceEFTA00021937
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00021937
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: IS"
To: Christian Everdell
Cc: "Mark S. Cohen"
Jeff Pa liuca <
Menninlef
Subject: RE: United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 20:43:15 +0000
'Laura
Pursuant to the Court's Order of this afternoon, we write to schedule a telephonic meet and confer on issues relating to a
protective order in the above-captioned case. Please let us know what time you are available today between 5:00 p.m.
and 8:00 p.m., or tomorrow between 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. In particular, it would be helpful to get the defendant's
current position on the following:
Whether you are aware of any case in any federal district in which a protective order was entered in a criminal
case that prevented the Government from showing its own documents to prospective witnesses or their counsel
without requiring restrictions upon those witnesses and their counsel;
Whether you are able to describe any expected reason why it would be necessary or useful for the defendant to
reference by name — rather than by pseudonym or other anonymized identifier — any victim in a public statement
or publicly-docketed filing (and rather than by sealed filing, if such named identification is necessary), such that
the Government may consider whether it can formulate language to address any such concerns, without
conceding any right of the defendant to name any individual who has self-identified as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein
or Ghislaine Maxwell at any time; and
Whether the defense is willing to itself propose any language to address the Government's concerns in relation
to the issue described immediately above, regarding the defendant's desire to be able to reference by name any
victim in a public statement or publicly-docketed filing, without conceding that any such right exists.
Additionally, also relating to the production of discovery, please mail, or otherwise have delivered, a 1 terabyte hard drive
for purposes of the Government's discovery production. While we are in the process of determining the size of an initial
production, and the size may total substantially less than 1 terabyte, that will ensure our ability to make a robust initial
production and should be suitable for subsequent productions as well. That can be sent to my attention at our Office.
Regards,
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
EFTA00021937
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01655772
16p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00010819
0p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
839p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00011452
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01951276
0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00020978
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.