Skip to main content
Skip to content
EFTA00021968EFTA00021978
Case File
efta-efta00021977DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00021977

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00021977
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Download Original PDF
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Nathan NYSD Chambers Cc: Jeff Pa Inca Subject: US v. Maxwell - Letter re Minor Victim-3 Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 16:55:12 +0000 Attachments: Govit_Letter_re_MV-3_and_VictimdFinal].pdf Chambers, Attached please find a letter in response to the Court's order yesterday regarding Minor Victim-3. The Government is not seeking redactions but is filing this letter temporarily under seal to permit the defense an opportunity to seek redactions, and pending the Court's resolution of the Government's other redaction requests. Respectfully submitted, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York New York, New York 10007 EFTA00021977

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00030934

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00022091

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00011452

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00030660

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00030569

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.