Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00023750DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00023750

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00023750
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' To: Jack Scarola <I Cc: Subject: RE: 12/04/09 . vs Epstein Deposition Transcript Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:51:53 +0000 (USANYS)" Jack, Thanks for speaking with me earlier today. The attorneys I mentioned are Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback, who represent the executors of Epstein's estate. I've provided them with your contact information, and as we discussed, they will likely be in touch to discuss whether you have any objections to them providing the transcript to us. On this subject, I wanted to let you know that our communications with the estate's attorneys about your client have been limited to our request for the transcript. We have not shared any details regarding your client or her cooperation with our investigation. Thank you, From: Jack Scarola Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 11:55 AM To: Cc: Subject: Re: 12/04/09 I am available right now. Sent from my iPad >; . vs Epstein Deposition Transcript On Sep 22, 2020, at 11:41 AM, Hi Jack, Do you have a moment for a brief call about this today or tomorrow? Thanks, CUSANYS) Sent from my iPhone On Sep 14, 2020, at 2:35 PM, Jack Scarola < > wrote: I am unaware of any protective order relating to the CMA case. wrote: On Sep 14, 2020, at 12:10 PM, > wrote: EFTA00023750 Jack, Are you able to tell us whether there was a protective order entered in the civil suit, or any other type of agreement that would govern disclosing materials from the civil case with us? When you shared the deposition, we assumed there were no such restrictions, but I wanted to check. Thanks, From: Jack Scarola <la Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 3:46 PM To: I < > Cc: Subject: Re: 12/04/09 vs Epstein Deposition Transcript Please let me know if you are able to locate the transcript. (USANYS) On Sep 10, 2020, at 11:30 AM, wrote: Jack, Thanks for your email. We will likely reach out to your adversary in the deposition to ask for a copy, but I wanted to check to see whether you had already done so. Thanks, From: Jack Scarola < > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 9:53 AM To: a. >; (USANYS) Subject: Fwd: 12/04/09 . vs Epstein Deposition Transcript The email exchange below confirms our inability to locate the first volume of deposition. However, attached are fairly detailed notes of Paralegal/Investigator Mike Danchuk, who attended the deposition and recorded these notes contemporaneously. appears to have held nothing back, and the notes certainly paint a picture of the kind of troubled young women who were particularly susceptible to Epstein's pattern of recruitment, grooming and victimization. Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Chris R. Rodgers" < Date: September 8, 2020 at 3:30:51 PM EDT To: Jack Scarola Cc: Mary McCann c:= M> "Wendy P. Calvet" < "cmayse pste in eta I [email protected] ne.com" <[email protected]> Subject: FW: 12/04/09 vs Epstein Deposition Transcript EFTA00023751 Jack, below is the "Unable to locate" response from Prose Court Reporting. Visual Evidence, the videography service used, also confirmed on Friday that a copy of the video is no longer available. I have attached Mike Danchuk's notes from that deposition. From: toni proseflorida.com Sent: September 7, 2020 7:03 AM To: Chris R. Rodgers Subject: RE: 12/04/09 M. vs Epstein Deposition Transcript Chris, I have searched our records and archives and I am unable to locate Volume I of this deposition from 2009. Sincerely, Toni ** I Privileged and Confidential I Electronic communication is not a secure mode of communication and may be accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. Personal messages express views solely of the sender and shall not be attributed to the law firm. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or by telephone at (800) 780-8607 and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. ** EFTA00023752

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00020703

0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case Amid DOJ Oversight Questions

The passage reveals that a federal prosecutor's office recused itself from the high‑profile Epstein victims’ rights case and notes a pending DOJ review prompted by Senate questioning of AG nominee Wil Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office formally recused itself from the Epstein victims’ rights case. The case was reassigned to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta. Sen. Ben Sasse questioned AG nominee Will

1p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00020865

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case Amid Calls for DOJ Review

The passage reveals a recusal by a federal prosecutor in the high‑profile Epstein case and notes that AG nominee William Barr was pressed to investigate DOJ handling. This provides a concrete lead—rec Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office formally recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case in early The case was reassigned to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta. Sen. Ben Sasse questioned AG nom

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.