Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00023802DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00023802

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00023802
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Jennifer Richardson Subject: DOJ ongoing Investigation. Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:00:13 +0000 Inline-Images: image543915.jpg; image517195.jpg Dear IM We and the Duke of York set out to assist your investigation when the DOJ asked for his help in January 2020. However, we regret to say that we have reached the conclusion that the DOJ's dealings with the Duke of York have not been designed to seek his assistance in investigating and prosecuting the targets of the investigation but instead have been used only to gather publicity for Mr Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. It is essential, if justice is to be done for Epstein's victims, that a proper and thorough criminal investigation is carried out. Although the public record indicates your office (SDNY) has been actively investigating Mr. Epstein and other targets for more than 2 years, the first time you ever attempted to make contact and request The Duke of York's help was on 2 January 2020. The Duke instructed my firm to make contact with you pertaining to this request. When we made contact, you confirmed that the Duke of York was not and is not a target of the US criminal investigation. Due to the publicity surrounding the investigation, we asked you to confirm that our discussions and any interview arrangements would remain confidential, in accordance with your rules. The Duke did not want to add to the media circus that has now surrounded the investigation. On 10 January 2020 you confirmed that any arrangements would indeed be kept confidential. We indicated that we would refer back to you once we had dealt with the various issues and procedures, which would need to be addressed to enable the Duke to cooperate to the fullest extent possible, including the need to obtain all the information that you might need to consider. It was at that time that we informed you, by email dated 20 January, that such preliminary issues would be dealt with within 14 days. It was also in that email that we confirmed that The Duke has a strong desire to cooperate with the ongoing investigation by the DOJ. Instead of waiting to hear from us (as you indicated on 22 January 2020), Mr Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, chose to make a public statement about the Duke on 27 January 2020. This led to press reports that there had been "a wall of silence" and that there had been "zero co- operation" by the Duke. These statements were not true. They should not have been made. Quite apart from your promise of confidentiality, in England it would not be thought to be in the interests of justice for any prosecutor or investigator to make public statements about witnesses who may be willing, in confidence, to assist their investigation. In England, prosecutors and investigators try to make sure that the investigation and trial of serious criminal cases take place in court and not in press conferences or publicity battles. When we complained about the way the Duke (and we) had been treated by the DOJ, you refused to apologise and you have now also gone back on your promise that any arrangements for the interview will be confidential. EFTA00023802 We cannot advise the Duke to speak to prosecutors who cannot be trusted to deal with him fairly nor to treat what he says or does confidentially. He has reluctantly accepted our advice that, in those circumstances, there is no purpose to be served in continuing to try to assist further. Finally we have no wish to engage in any further publicity battle about the DOJ's conduct and for that reason we ask that you treat this email as private and confidential. Regards Gary Gary Bloxsome I Partner Blackfords I LLP RANKED IN Chambers j UK AIPO 2020 cis indinnum 300 FOP tint 1010 Fords LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England & Wales with registered number A list of members' names is available at this _Joress. GDPR: details of how we handle personal data can be found in ourPrivacy Statement Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 462078. EFTA00023803

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Display Name

Display Name Email UUID 6ICE9350-0B4F-0000-AB39-E8Of'2A59A443 Distribution 'I've TO Recipient Type SysternGroupMember Recipient Display Name Email IRA D 9D77B2D0-19C1-0000-A9894Y2C00000S8D0 Distribution Type TO Recipient Tvpc SystemGroupkkmber Recipient Display Name Email _ U LID 4237CDC0-1407-0000-AF20-8402120084D2 Distribution Type TO Recipient Type _Recipient Display Name a Email UUID 66E64C10-1320-0000-8ECI-2F2162868DCC Distribution Type TO Recipient Txpe SystemGroupMember Expire 0 Delay delivers until 0 Delegated fake Archived fake Read fake Deleted fake Opened fake Completed fake Security Normal Box type Inbox Return notification hen opened fake Return notification "hen deleted fake Return notification when completed fake Return notification %%hen declined fake Return notification "hen accepted false Archive S'en ion 5.3 Internal ID 5D4F0066.NYMDOMLNYMADMI.100.16B6F30.1.F EAE. [email protected] LNY MADM 1.103.0.1.0.141

1000p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01654956

0p
Court UnsealedAug 19, 2019

Letter Motion

Letter Motion, USA v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug 19, 2019)

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Bee: "Berman Geoffrey (USANYS

From: Cc: Bee: "Berman Geoffrey (USANYS Subject: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:15:07 +0000 Attachments: 2019 8-14.pdf SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 EFTA00094360 Contents Public Corruption Epstein General Crimes Sprecher Violent and Organized Crime Walter Civil Division NYCHA Securities and Commodities Fraud Margulies Sharma and Farkas Matters of Interest Obama-era counsel Greg Craig's trial postponed; new jiLD, to be selected Epstein Saga Puts Spotlight on Crime Victim's Rights Act Donziger Faces Criminal Contempt Prosecution Team at Seward & Kissel Jail Where Epstein Died Has Record of Security Blunders 2nd Circuit's Decision Could Embolden Federal Anti-Corruption Prosecutors Public Corruption Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Raped Me When I Was 15 NYT By Jennifer Araoz 8/14/19 The first time I stepped into Jeffrey Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side in the fall of 2001, I noticed his security cameras.

28p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00025549

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.