Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00024921DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00024921

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00024921
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: (USANYS) [Contractor]" Subject: RE: Courtroom connect Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:34:14 +0000 Attachments: 2021-11-17 Courtroom Connect Letter.docx Following up on this actually, I just spoke with who is requesting courtroom connect for (and he did for NCAA also). He said that getting courtroom connect is not going to happen without a signed order from the judge. He recommended getting it submitted sooner rather than later to leave time for logistics to be worked out. Would it be possible to submit a proposed order and request to Judge Nathan soon, tonight or tomorrow? I've drafted one (attached) using the language • used in his, which I forwarded below. Let me know what you think or if you need anything from me, thanks. From: (USANYS) [Contractor] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 6:23 PM To: < .>; (USANYS) I < Subject: FW: Courtroom connect >; FYI, I am going to check in with tomorrow about the procedure for courtroom connect internet (I flagged it for her yesterday but forgot to check in this afternoon), but it looks like we will need to send a letter and proposed order to the judge to approve it before coordinating with the tech folks who install and make it happen. If this is in fact what we need to do, which I'll again check with about tomorrow, I think we should try and send such a letter/proposed order tomorrow (to ideally get it approved as soon as possible and a tech check scheduled for before Thanksgiving). From: Mark,. (USANYS) < > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 5:59 PM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] Subject: RE: Courtroom connect From: (USANYS) [Contractor] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 5:58 PM To: Mark,. (USANYS) < > Subject: Courtroom connect Hey When you get a chance could you please send me the application you sent to Judge Kaplan to get courtroom connect approved? Thanks, Paralegal Specialist U.S. Attorney's Office I SDNY EFTA00024921 New York, NY 10007 Office: Cell: EFTA00024922

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: DOJ-OGR-00009862

The document discusses the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, focusing on the jury deliberation process as described by a juror named Scotty. It also touches on a lawsuit against Prince Andrew, with Judge Kaplan appearing skeptical of Andrew's defense. The document was filed on March 28, 2022.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct

5(19/22, 3:52 PM SEA At. "250SC. fktmct JcereY Epsteh - Wildpedla Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.1io61 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.E•g-91 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.1139-) All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court' ll Epstein made many art-pl-atirt r s_ettlements with alleged victims.W23 - - - _ E_XCAt "-Vet 5sE RItACt PnOi- CiOR °NICER • - 40L'aritfrieerPROS1 1701-i0.Ni o> SIE•us) i1/44".,e036( C ; Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, November 30, 2018. Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014)*SC7ck%A L. ne,OSC Rt p Rom N)Eiszci poS IT c"),3 A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 (Courtney Wild) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Vi

32p
Court UnsealedSep 10, 2021

Prince Andrew- Process server's affidavit

Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 10 Filed 09/10/21 Page 1 of 32 Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 10 Filed 09/10/21 Page 2 of 32 Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 10 Filed 09/10/21 Page 3 of 32 Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 10 Filed 09/10/21 Page 4 of 32 Case 1:21-cv-06702-LAK Document 10 Filed 09/10/21 Page 5 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. PRINCE ANDREW, DUKE OF YORK, a/k/a ANDREW ALBERT CHRISTIA

32p
Court UnsealedFeb 15, 2022

Giuffre settlement

February 15, 2022 VIA ECF Honorable Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Court 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007-1312 Re: Giuffre v. Prince Andrew, Case No. 21-cv-06702-LAK Our File No. 7147-2 Dear Judge Kaplan: We write jointly with counsel for defendant to advise the Court that the parties reached a settlement in principle of the above-referenced action. The parties anticipate filing a stipulation of dismissal of the case within thirty (30) days. See Exhibit A. In the interim, the

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, February 5, 2020

From: To: Subject: SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, February 5, 2020 Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 22:11:23 +0000 Attachments: 02-05-2020.pdf SDNY News Clips Wednesday, February 5, 2020 EFTA00095936 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Parnas Avenatti Securities and Commodities Fraud Blaszczak Madoff Civil NYCHA Terrorism and International Narcotics Schulte White Plains Da Silva Complex Frauds and Cybercrime Mark Scott Matters of Interest Weinstein Public Corruption Epstein Epstein accusers and Harry Dunn's family plea for UK-US cooperation The Hill By Caroline Davies 2/5/2020 The family of teenage motorcyclist Harry Dunn and the alleged victims of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein have united to put pressure on Anne Sacoolas and the Duke of York to "co-operate with law enforcement". Lisa Bloom, lawyer for six alleged Epstein victims, and Radd Seiger, spokesman for the parents of Dunn, 19, joined forces on Wednesday to call for Sacoolas to return to the UK, and f

19p
Dept. of JusticeLegal FilingUnknown

court filing/news article excerpt: DOJ-OGR-00009183

The document describes how the Ghislaine Maxwell jury deliberated and reached a verdict, and also discusses a court hearing in a related lawsuit involving Prince Andrew, where the judge appeared dismissive of Andrew's defense arguments.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.