EFTA00027343

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

EFTA00020703

From: '

From: ' To: Jack Scarola <I Cc: '1 „cl Subject: RE: Epstein Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 20:47:45 +0000 Mr. Scarola, We have had difficulty contacting Ms. in connection with our investigation. Are you in touch with her and able to set up a meeting with us? We would be interested in speaking with her and can travel to Florida to do so. thank you, From: Jack Scarola < MI> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2019 08:54 To: Cc: ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG Brad Edwards Subject: Re: Epstein For whatever value it may have in connection with your pending prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, one of his victims, , who was repeatedly molested in Florida beginning at age 14, received multiple gifts of lingerie from Epstein shipped to her in Florida from NY. may be reached at and is willing to speak to investigators. EFTA00099291

EFTA01387839

EFTA00020865

(USANYS)"

From: (USANYS)" To: "MM, (USANYS) [Contractor]" <I a Subject: FW: Private and Confidential Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 19:18:41 +0000 S This is the email that forwarded to me for handling by us. Please let me know what you think is best approach that will give respect to the fact htat Ms. Sarnoff has been previously emailing her information to AG Barr directly and that also respects her efforts to be helpful. Thanks Fro To: William Barr Cc: Subject: Private and Confidential Dear Mr. Barr, In the Epstein case, one victim's testimony, describes how she was "trafficked" for sex. Given my understanding of that law, and under TVPA, the victim's testimony does not seem to match the criteria for sex trafficking. If I am correct, why are the courts allowing Ms. case to be defined as a child sex trafficking case? According to her testimony in the first complaint, Jane Doe 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, [filed May 1, 2009 in Southern District Fl] and later in a telephone interview