Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00028423DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00028423

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00028423
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: "Martin G. Weinberg" C Cc: Weingarten Subject: RE: Protective Order Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:58:36 +0000 Attachments: 2019-07-24, JE,_protective_order_for_discoveryiRMB).pdf "'Miller, Michael"' ,'Reid Marty, Attached is a revised protective order, which incorporates the edits from our discussion today. If there are any issues or questions, please let us know. Otherwise, if you could please send us a signed copy, we'll take care of submitting it to the Court. Thanks, From: Martin G. Weinberg <MII > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 10:51 AM To: Cc: 'Miller, Michael' ,ei; 'Reid Weingarten' <fl Subject: RE: Protective Order 'Martin Weinberg' < Hi Some points for discussion or consideration re draft Protective Order: Pg 2, line 2 - we consent to the entry of the Order but not necessarily all of the averments made by the Government in support of the Order Pg 3 - par 2 - we need to distinguish between providing discovery electronically to others on the defense team (encrypt or password protected) and providing hard copies of discovery for the purpose of review by counsel or by counsel or others on defense team with the defendant at MCC Pg 3 - par 3 -5 - these obligations should extend to Govt as well as defense Pg 3 - par 4 - are you precluding public discussion of identity of witnesses already known to the defense i.e. known independent of the discovery Pg 3/4 - par 5 - are you asking for redacted public filings or the entire filing being filed under seal - we could redact any quoting of the discovery or attaching of the discovery if that suffices Pg 4-5 par 7 - there is no need for allegations of potential obstruction or harm to witnesses in this case - I would request that such language be redacted as unnecessary if we are not contesting the clause. Please advise if the Govt intends to mark all 302s as "confidential" or just the identifying info (names, addresses, etc). Par 12 - defense should be allowed to retain discovery through the filing date of a 2255 Reid, Mike may have additional questions, points. Available after 1 to discuss. Thanks Marty Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. EFTA00028423 Boston. MA 02116 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. From: Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 7:02 PM To: Martin G. Weinberg <=. > Cc: Subject: Protective Order Marty, Following up on our conversation this morning, I'm attaching the proposed protective order we discussed. If you have any questions, or think it would be productive to schedule a call to discuss, please let us know. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 EFTA00028424

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00030184

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01687577

38p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Si!lo J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 July 8, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Henry Pitman United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Pitman: The Government respectfully submits this letter in advance of the bail hearing scheduled for July 9, 2019, in the above-captioned case. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court should issue a permanent order of detention of the defendant; he cannot meet his burden of overcoming the presumption that there is no combination of conditions that would reasonably assure his continued appearance in this case or protect the safety of the community were he to be released. As set forth below, the charges in this case are exceptionally serious: the defendant is alleged to

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 8, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Henry Pitman United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Pitman: The Government respectfully submits this letter in advance of the bail hearing scheduled for July 8, 2019, in the above-captioned case. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court should order that the defendant be detained pending trial; he cannot meet his burden of overcoming the presumption that there is no combination of conditions that would reasonably assure his continued appearance in this case or protect the safety of the community were he to be released. As set forth below, the charges in this case are exceptionally serious: the defendant is alleged to be

10p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01687991

76p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 1 of 14 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 12, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Richard M. Berman United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) Dear Judge Berman: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the defendant's Motion for Pretrial Release (the "Release Motion"), dated July 11, 2019 (Dkt. 6), and in further support of its Memorandum in Support of Detention (the "Detention Memo"), submitted to Magistrate Judge Pitman on July 8, 2019, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein (Ex. A). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The defendant is a serial sexual predator who is charged with abusing underage girls for years. A grand jury has ret

28p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.