Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00030660DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00030660

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00030660
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USANYS)" <1 To: ' Cc: 'M (USANYS)" anr " Subject: RE: updates Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 16:00:21 +0000 Importance: Normal Thanks. Makes sense. As part of that, can you just remind the Brass in a sentence or less who she is? From: Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 11:56 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: RE: updates Thanks, sending now—I'm adding one bullet point, which is that we are scheduled to meet with on 9/11 for a reverse proffer. I'm not sure whether we had discussed that, so wanted to make sure you were aware. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 201911:06 AM To: Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: updates Got it, thanks. Please make those changes and pass up. From: Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 11:05 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < < .. Subject: RE: updates Thanks, M. Only small changes: Because of Hurricane Dorian, it looks like this week's Florida trip will have to be rescheduled. I'll make that change. still appears to be open to a videoconference interview. What she backed out of was meeting us last week. The interview will be in person, not by videoconference (that's my error, I'll fix it). pointed that out and Regarding the attorney proffer, I would say she has denied knowing the victims were minors and that the massages would be sexual in nature. From: (USANYS) <1. 1 ) Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 10:58 AM EFTA00030660 To: Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: updates Hope you all had a good long weekend and got to take a bit of a break. Assuming no big developments since Friday afternoon, I've proposed some modest additions/changes to your bullets, below. Can you take a quick look, note my question below on and let me know if there is anything worth discussing further? If not, you can send on to the Brass noting this is per Geoff's request for an update. Thanks Oh, and we'll do something more official soon, but a formal welcome to the unit, On August 27th, the team met separately with and and. are Victim-2 and Victim-3 in the Indictment and have previously described as the individual through whom they scheduled all of their encounters with Epstein. Critically, both have also said was present when they arrived to perform the massages (and thus would have seen how old they were) and on some occasions paid them after the "massages" were complete. During our meetings on August 27, MI and both conveyed that they are willing to continue to cooperate in an ongoing investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators. On August 27th, the team met with who reported being sexually assaulted at several of Epstein's properties while she was an adult. described being recruited to perform massages for Epstein by Ghislaine Maxwell. indicated that she would cooperate with our ongoing investigation. On August 27th, the team interviewed ME, who described being recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell and caused to engage in sexualized massage sessions with Epstein, during which she was sexually assaulted. These assaults occurred in London, Florida, the USVI, and New York, beginning when was 17 and continuing into her early twenties. These incidents occurred in the 1990s, before the sex trafficking statutes were enacted. indicated that she would cooperate with our ongoing investigation. On August 27th, the team met with =I, who has previously been interviewed and has described being sexually assaulted by Epstein at several of his properties when she was 17. has reported that was present during at least one of these encounters. has indicated that she will cooperate with our ongoing investigation. On August 29th, the team met with la, and a, who have each reported being sexually abused by Epstein while they were adults. We are in the process of scheduling an interview with , who, as noted, was an adult at the time she was abused, and has accused Ghislaine Maxwell of being involved in her abuse. We anticipate that the interview will occur by videoconference, likely during the next two weeks. [Is this still happening, I thought she had backed out?J Weather permitting, the team hopes to travel to Florida the week of September 3 for two meetings. First, we hope to meet with (M) for a second proffer. worked as an assistant to Epstein in 2004, reporting to Her duties included scheduling two to three "massages" for Epstein each day he was in Florida. Second, we hope to meet with for a reverse proffer. When was 16, Epstein proposed that she recruit girls for him, and brought her young friends to Epstein for "massages" for several years. was granted immunity by SDFL and provided grand jury testimony as part of the prior investigatoin, and we hope to pursue as a witness in this case. Our understanding is that coordinated appointments for the victims through On September 6th, we are scheduled to meet with defense counsel for an second attorney proffer. At the initial attorney proffer, attorney's substantially minimized her knowledge of the criminal elements of her conduct, namely the age of the girls she was scheduling to "massage" Epstein. EFTA00030661 On September 9th, we are scheduled to interview by videoconference. has accused Ghislaine Maxwell of recruiting her when she was 16. On September 16th, we are scheduled to interview MI, who worked as Epstein's "house man" at the New York Residence for many years. To our knowledge, has never been interviewed before. During the week of September 16th, the team plans to travel to California for several meetings. We hope to meet with a victim who is described in our previous memorandum regarding co-conspirators. We have previously interviewed who has told us that was not only involved in scheduling her "massages;' but met/observed in person and was present for conversations about the sexual natures of the encounters with Epstein, and we hope to discuss whether is willing to cooperate with our ongoing investigation. While we are in California, we also hope to schedule follow-up interviews with and described above. EFTA00030662

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00030569

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SI 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00099941 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case. 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New Yolk 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00011452

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00030934

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00077606 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.