Case File
efta-efta00031007DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceEFTA00031007
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00031007
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
(USANYS)"
To: '
(USANYS)"
Cc: '
i.TANYS)" <1
Subject: Re: Question from HQ
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:39:58 +0000
(USANYS)"
Sounds like it.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 17, 2019, at 11:55 AM,
(USANYS)
> wrote:
We got some clarification below. Are you comfortable with us just responding no?
From:
(OIG)
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 11:43 AM
To:
(USANYS)
Cc:
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: Question from HQ
As you may know IG
was a prosecutor in the SDNY and I believe he wants to know if the BOP disregarded
requests, directives or court orders from the prosecutors or Judge in the SONY on the underlying case as it related to
phone use.
I believe HQ wants to know if the SDNY prosecutors office or Judge had any additional requirements, requests, directives
or court orders that the BOP needed to comply with that are above standard BOP policy for his phone use. Such as
specific recording of phone calls made, reporting to the SDNY of when phone calls were made, to whom, discussion
topics, observing or monitoring phone calls, writing memorandums of what they BOP staff may of heard.
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of the Inspector General
New York Field Office
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 11:28 AM
To:
• (OIG)
Cc:
(USANYS) •rz
>
Subject: Re: Question from HQ
Does "memorialize Epstein's phone calls" mean was SDNY required to keep its own log of Epstein's calls at MCC?
On Aug 17, 2019, at 10:01 AM,
. (OIG)
wrote:
EFTA00031007
I just received clarification on the question that OIG HQ has regarding the underlying case. The question and
clarification are below.
•
In addition to BOP policies, did SDNY have requirements to memorialize Epstein's phone calls related to the
underlying case? If so, were they followed?
•
Did BOP need to take notes on the conversation (since it's not recorded) or were they just required to keep a
phone number log?"
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of the Inspector General
New York Field Office
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 8:10 PM
To:
. (016)
Cc:
(USANYS)<
>
Subject: Re: Question from HQ
What do you mean by "memorialize phone calls"?
On Aug 16, 2019, at 7:17 PM,
. (016)
> wrote:
and.,
My HQ has the following question on the underlying case, can you please forward this to the prosecutors on the
underlying case? Thank you.
o In addition to BOP policies, did SDNY have requirements to memorialize Epstein's phone calls related to
the underlying case? If so, were they followed?
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of the Inspector General
New York Field Office
EFTA00031008
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.