EFTA00032085

From: ' cj To: iMpl iSYNASUr Cc: "I (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Rule 23 motion Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 22:21:29 +0000 Attachments: 2020-07-22,GMJetter_to_Judge_Nathan_re_Local_Rule_23.1_v2.docx )" Very sorry for the delay—I've lost count of how many times I've had to restart my computer today. Attached is the draft in its current form. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 6:18 PM To: Cc: (USANYS) ) Subject: RE: Rule 23 motion Okay, thanks. On the draft, if someone could just send me whatever you have at whatever stage it is now, I'll take it from here as I really want to get this up to the Brass tonight. Thanks From: Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 5:59 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) ; < i>; Subject: RE: Rule 23 motion Perfect, and I did - I mentioned we'd be filing a response in the next day or so. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 17:57 To: Cc: (USANYS) iS Subject: Re: Rule 23 motion >; I think no position is right, although I think you can tell him we plan to file something in response soon. Speaking of, what is the status of the draft? Sent from my iPhone On Jul 22, 2020, at 3:58 PM, wrote: Just FYI for everyone, Brad just called and asked if we had a view as to whether victims' counsel should file a response to the defense motion from last night. I said my assumption was that we had no position or view at all with respect to EFTA00032085 what victims' counsel should or should not do, and wouldn't direct victim counsel on something like that, but that I would let him know if that was incorrect. So please let me know if we should convey something else, and I'm happy to pass it along, otherwise I've conveyed our neutrality. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00032086