Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00032785DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00032785

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00032785
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading PDF viewer...

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: ' Subject: RE: Request for Assistance - United States v. Maxwell Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:35:13 +0000 Good afternoon, Following up on the below, is there a time when you would be available for a call, please? Thank you, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 2:37 PM To: Subject: Request for Assistance - United States v. Maxwell Good afternoon, I am one of the federal prosecutors handling the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein's co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the Southern District of New York under case caption United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). and from the FBI provided me with your contact information and suggested you may be able to assist our team in contacting current and former employees of the Palm Beach Police Department who may need to testify at the upcoming trial in our case. In particular, our team expects to introduce evidence gathered during the PBPD's investigation of Epstein in 2005, primarily from the search of Epstein's residence in October 2005, and we will need PBPD witnesses to authenticate that evidence. Would you be available for a call this week to discuss the particular witnesses we are hoping to contact, please? I can be reached any time on my cellphone at and am also happy to schedule a time that is convenient for a call. Thank you very much for your help. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 EFTA00032785 EFTA00032786

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.