From: '
Summary
From: ' To: Brad Edwards c, Brittany Henderson < Cc: ' " < >, ' (USANYS)" Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:32:54 +0000 Hi Brad and Brittany— Just following up on this. Thanks very much. From: Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 12:30 PM To: 'Brad Edwards' 'Brittany Henderson' Cc: (USANYS) < > Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Brad and Brittany, As an update regarding Friday's conference, I'm attaching a scheduling order with additional information. Could you please let us know by tomorrow whether your client plans to attend, and if so, whether she intends to attend in person or by phone? Thanks, From: Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 1:19 PM To: Brad Edwards <a Brittany Henderson < Cc: (USANYS) < > Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Hi Brad and Brittany, We wanted to let you know that there are two upcoming court appearances in this case: • Judge Nathan has scheduled an in-person arraignment for April
Persons Referenced (5)
“From: ' To: Brad ,Edwards, c, Brittany Henderson < Cc: ' " < >, ' (USANYS)" Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine”
The Defendant“.... • The Second Circuit has scheduled a remote oral argument in connection with the defendant's bail appeal for April 26th at 10 a.m. Second Circuit arguments are livestrea...”
United StatesUnited States Attorney“...link: https://ww2.ca2.uscourts.gov/court.html Best, EFTA00039813 Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00039814”
Ghislaine MaxwellTags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Subject: Re: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019
From: To: Subject: Re: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:27:22 +0000 Ha, really? In that case pretty sure I've seen the filing but will take a look. Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Jul 31, 2019, at 7:24 PM, ) < > wrote: That article is a reference to a government filing from over a month ago (Spencer Kuvin seems especially interested in being quotes in belated but inflammatory fashion on these issues) — but in any event, the NDGA filing from then is attached. From: Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 17:14 To: Subject: FW: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 It looks like NDGa just filed something in the CVRA litigation — do you have a copy by any chance? From: Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 5:12 PM Cc: Subject: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Contents Public Corruption. 2 Epstein. 2 Collins. 18 Securities and Commodities Fraud. 20 Stewart 20 Thompson. 22 Pinto-Thomaz. 24 Narco
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,
Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 101-1 Filed 12/20/19 Page 1 of 41
Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 101-1 Filed 12/20/19 Page 1 of 41 EXHIBIT A EFTA00092647 Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 101-1 Filed 12/20/19 Page 2 of 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Counterclaim Defendant. Civil Action No. I :19-cv-3377 (LAP) AMENDED COMPLAINT EFTA00092648 Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 101-1 Filed 12/20/19 Page 3 of 41 Plaintiff, formerly known as 'for her Complaint against Defendant, Alan Dershowitz, avers upon personal knowledge as to her own acts and status and upon information and belief and to all other matters: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This suit arises out of Defendant's sexual abuse of Plaintiff, his defamatory statements of and concerning Plaintiff, and his unlawful interception of Plaintiff's communications. 2. During 2000-2002, beginning when Plaintiff was 16, Plaintiff was
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.