Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00039816DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Laura Menninger

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00039816
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: Laura Menninger To: "[email protected] Cc: (USANYS)" Jeff Pagliuca Bobbi Stemhenn Nicole Simmons Subject: US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment of Trial] Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:22:17 +0000 Attachments: 2021.04.22_Deils_Letter for Adjournment.pdf Judge Nathan - Pursuant to this Court's Order of April 20, 2021 (Dkt. 221), attached please find counsel's Letter Motion for an Adjournment of the trial. Counsel for Ms. Maxwell request redaction of their other clients' names and case numbers from this Letter Motion pursuant to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6 which prohibits lawyers from revealing confidential information related to a client even where that information is publicly available. See In Re. Anonymous, 654 N.E. 2.d. 1128 (Ind. 1995) (lawyer violated Rule 1.6 by disclosing information relating to representation of client, even though information "was readily available from public sources and not confidential in nature"); In

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Laura Menninger To: "[email protected] Cc: (USANYS)" Jeff Pagliuca Bobbi Stemhenn Nicole Simmons Subject: US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment of Trial] Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:22:17 +0000 Attachments: 2021.04.22_Deils_Letter for Adjournment.pdf Judge Nathan - Pursuant to this Court's Order of April 20, 2021 (Dkt. 221), attached please find counsel's Letter Motion for an Adjournment of the trial. Counsel for Ms. Maxwell request redaction of their other clients' names and case numbers from this Letter Motion pursuant to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6 which prohibits lawyers from revealing confidential information related to a client even where that information is publicly available. See In Re. Anonymous, 654 N.E. 2.d. 1128 (Ind. 1995) (lawyer violated Rule 1.6 by disclosing information relating to representation of client, even though information "was readily available from public sources and not confidential in nature"); In re Bryan, 61 P.3d 641 (Kan. 2003) (lawyer violated Rule 1.6 by disclosing, in court documents, existence of defamation suit against former client); State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n v. McGee, 48 P.3d 787, 791 (Okla. 2002) (a lawyer's duty of confidentiality attaches "to all information relating to the representation, whatever its source"). Upon direction of the Court, counsel will file either the redacted or unredacted version of this letter on the public docket. Best regards, Laura Menninger Laura A. Menninger I Partner Haddon, Mor an & Foreman, P.C. O 80203 EFTA00039816

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.