Skip to main content
Skip to content
U.S. Department of JusticeFrom: '
Case File
efta-efta00040235DOJ Data Set 9Other

USDC SDNY

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 11/15/21 SMITH VILLAZOR November 15, 2021 BY E-MAIL to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Maxwell. No. 20 Cr. 330 Dear Judge Nathan: Smith Villazor LLF. New York, New York 10019 www.smithvillazor.com Patrick J. Smith may file a motion to quash the subpoena on or before Friday, November 19, 2021. The motion should not repeat arguments made in the Government's motion to quash, which is due on Thursday, November 18, 2021. The Defense shall respond to both motions on or before Monday, November 22, 2021. This memo endorsement is filed temporarily under seal to allow the parties to propose redactions. Any redactions to this letter and the Defendant's motion must be filed on the docket by November 21, 2021. SO ORDERED. We represent the independent admin'strator of the Epstein Victims

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00040235
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity

Summary

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 11/15/21 SMITH VILLAZOR November 15, 2021 BY E-MAIL to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Maxwell. No. 20 Cr. 330 Dear Judge Nathan: Smith Villazor LLF. New York, New York 10019 www.smithvillazor.com Patrick J. Smith may file a motion to quash the subpoena on or before Friday, November 19, 2021. The motion should not repeat arguments made in the Government's motion to quash, which is due on Thursday, November 18, 2021. The Defense shall respond to both motions on or before Monday, November 22, 2021. This memo endorsement is filed temporarily under seal to allow the parties to propose redactions. Any redactions to this letter and the Defendant's motion must be filed on the docket by November 21, 2021. SO ORDERED. We represent the independent admin'strator of the Epstein Victims

Persons Referenced (4)

JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA

“...Smith cc: Patrick J. Smith Smith Villazor LLP Christian R. Everdell, Esq., Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq., Laura A. Menninger, Esq., Mark Stewart Cohen, Esq., Bobbi C. Stemheim,...”

CHRISTIAN R. EVERDELL

“...ly submitted, /s/ Patrick J. Smith cc: Patrick J. Smith Smith Villazor LLP Christian R. Everdell, Esq., Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq., Laura A. Menninger, Esq., Mark Stewart Cohen...”

Patrick J. SmithJeffrey Epstein

“...established to confidentially resolve 11/15/21 claims of sexual abuse against Jeffrey Epstein, his Estate, and other related individuals and entities. This afternoon we wer...”

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
View on efta.gov
Browse DOJ EFTA Releases (OCR)EFTA 00040235

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 11/15/21 SMITH VILLAZOR November 15, 2021 BY E-MAIL to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Maxwell. No. 20 Cr. 330 Dear Judge Nathan: Smith Villazor LLF. New York, New York 10019 www.smithvillazor.com Patrick J. Smith may file a motion to quash the subpoena on or before Friday, November 19, 2021. The motion should not repeat arguments made in the Government's motion to quash, which is due on Thursday, November 18, 2021. The Defense shall respond to both motions on or before Monday, November 22, 2021. This memo endorsement is filed temporarily under seal to allow the parties to propose redactions. Any redactions to this letter and the Defendant's motion must be filed on the docket by November 21, 2021. SO ORDERED. We represent the independent admin'strator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, the litigation-alternative program established to confidentially resolve 11/15/21 claims of sexual abuse against Jeffrey Epstein, his Estate, and other related individuals and entities. This afternoon we were informed by counsel for the government that the defendant has sought, and the Court intends to authorize, a subpoena directed to under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c) for certain documents. We write to (i) inform the Court that we are authorized to aacce. t service p of the subpoena on behalf of and (ii) request a briefing schedule for anticipated motion to quash the subpoena. We understand that the government intends to file a motion to quash the subpoena, with a deadline of this Wednesday, November 17, 2021. Given that we have just learned of the subpoena today, the issues it presents, and mindful of the impending start date of trial, we respectfully request until November 23, 2021 to file a motion to quash on behalf. We are available should the Court have any questions. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Patrick J. Smith cc: Patrick J. Smith Smith Villazor LLP Christian R. Everdell, Esq., Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq., Laura A. Menninger, Esq., Mark Stewart Cohen, Esq., Bobbi C. Stemheim, Esq. (by e-mail) Am* EFTA00040235

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.smithvillazor.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

USDC SDNY

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 11/15/21 SMITH VILLAZOR November 15, 2021 BY E-MAIL to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Maxwell, No. 20 Cr. 330 Dear Judge Nathan: Smith Villazor LLF. New York, New York 10019 www.smithvillazor.com Patrick J. Smith may file a motion to quash the subpoena on or before Friday, November 19, 2021. The motion should not repeat arguments made in the Government's motion to quash, which is due on Thursday, November 18, 2021. The Defense shall respond to both motions on or before Monday, November 22, 2021. This memo endorsement is filed temporarily under seal to allow the parties to propose redactions. Any redactions to this letter and the Defendant's motion must be filed on the docket by November 21, 2021. SO ORDERED. We represen the independent admircstrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Pr

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00038962

0p
Court UnsealedJul 27, 2020

Letter Motion

Letter Motion, USA v. Maxwell, No. 1:20-cr-00330-1 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 27, 2020)

17p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USANYS)"

From: (USANYS)" To: Christian Everdell Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Letter Motion Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 20:29:58 +0000 Hey Chris, I think all that's left is your response on Witness-3, and then the Court's order. We'll circulate our proposed redactions to the Dietz/Loftus briefing tomorrow after the conference. Thanks From: Christian Everdell <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 2:47 PM To: Rohrbach, Andrew (USANYS) <[email protected]> Subject: (EXTERNAL] RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Letter Motion Will do. Taking care of it now. From: Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 2:42 PM To: Christian Everdell < Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Letter Motion Hey Chris — yes, and you can also file your response on GX-52. (Our original letter is already on the docket at 457.) From: Christian Everdell Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 2:40 PM To: Subject: (EXTERNAL]

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Cc: Jeff Pagliuca cipae,huca(tclunllaw.com>, Laura Memunger Klmennme,er(alimflaw.corn.?.

Fromi To: Cc: Jeff Pagliuca cipae,huca(tclunllaw.com>, Laura Memunger Klmennme,er(alimflaw.corn.?. bestentheim_mae.com <besternheirn(iipnac.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 17:41:14 +0000 Counsel — The defense has no redactions to propose. Thanks, Chris From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2021 11:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e- mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS••• There is no charge for viewing opinions. U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 11/19/2021 at 11:21 AM EST and filed on 11/19/2021 Case Name: USA v. Maxwell Case Number: 1:20-cr-0033

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

k7e2MaxC kjc

k7e2MaxC kjc UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Before: New York, N.Y. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) x Teleconference Arraignment Bail Hearing July 14, 2020 3:05 p.m. HON. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge APPEARANCES AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorneys COHEN & GRESSER, LLP Attorneys for Defendant BY: MARK S. COHEN CHRISTIAN R. EVERDELL HADDON MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA LAURA A. MENNINGER SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00066216 k7e2MaxC kjc THE COURT: Good afternoon, everyone. This is Judge Nathan presiding. This is United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 330. I will tak

91p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.