Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00040537DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00040537
Pages
6
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From To Cc Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:18:09 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; image003.png; image004.png Thanks very much for speaking earlier. I had a call with and we figured out that several of these numbers are for computers whose drives were processed under a different NYC number, so the computers have no independent data that would have been loaded into Relativity. That said, we confirmed that we are still missing data from the following NYC numbers, all of which should have some data that needs to be loaded to Relativity: • NYC024342 • NYC024347 • NYC024351 • NYC024370 • NYC027908 • NYC027909 • NYC027910 • NYC027913 Looking more closely at the numbers on the screenshot you sent, I see several numbers that do not appear on the FBI's spreadsheet at all. Those are: • NYC029708 • NYC029710 • NYC029711 • NYC029713 Is it possible the "9" and "7" in those numbers got flipped? Because the FBI

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From To Cc Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:18:09 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png; image003.png; image004.png Thanks very much for speaking earlier. I had a call with and we figured out that several of these numbers are for computers whose drives were processed under a different NYC number, so the computers have no independent data that would have been loaded into Relativity. That said, we confirmed that we are still missing data from the following NYC numbers, all of which should have some data that needs to be loaded to Relativity: • NYC024342 • NYC024347 • NYC024351 • NYC024370 • NYC027908 • NYC027909 • NYC027910 • NYC027913 Looking more closely at the numbers on the screenshot you sent, I see several numbers that do not appear on the FBI's spreadsheet at all. Those are: • NYC029708 • NYC029710 • NYC029711 • NYC029713 Is it possible the "9" and "7" in those numbers got flipped? Because the FBI's spreadsheet does have NYC027908, NYC027910, NYC027911, and NYC027913. That number switch would account for three of the numbers on my first list. Thanks, From: Sent: Monday, October 5, 202011:14 AM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review if you have a moment to talk please give me a call at Thank you. From: Sent: Monday, October 5, 202011:11 AM Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review EFTA00040537 Thanks very much, It looks like this list is missing the following NYC numbers, which the FBI indicated in the attached spreadsheet were produced to SDNY on July 23, 2020. Any idea where these might be? • NYC024342 • NYC024347 • NYC024351 • NYC024367 • NYC024370 • NYC024385 • NYC024387 • NYC024389 • NYC024391 • NYC024393 • NYC027908 • NYC027909 • NYC027910 • NYC027913 Happy to get on a call if that would be useful. Thanks again, From: Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 9:27 AM Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review Good Morning, Here is the screenshot you requested: New_Search Warrant Returns_FBI NYC024328 + .... d NYC024332 +.... Li NYC024363 +.... d NYC024365 NYC024366 + -- d NYC024369 NYC024369_1 + -- d NYC024371 NYC024372 + -- d NYC024383 4-- d NYC024384 EFTA00040538 USvE_20200728 NYCO24321 NYCO24323 NYCO24324 NYCO24326 }....Li NYCO24327 •F-- d NYCO24328 }....Li NYCO24329 •F-- d NYCO24334 }....Li NYCO24336 •F-- d NYCO24337 NYCO24339 NYCO24340 4- d NYCO24341 NYCO24343 }....j NYCO24344 •F-- d NYCO24345 NYCO24346 •F-- d NYCO24348 NYCO24349 •F-- d NYCO24350 NYCO24353 NYCO24354 NYCO24355 NYCO24362 NYCO24363 NYCO24364 +....Li NYCO24365 EFTA00040539 +.... NYCO24368 +.... NYCO24371 + .... NYCO24383 +.... NYCO24386 + .... NYCO24388 +.... NYCO24390 + .... NYCO24392 +....j NYCO24394 + .... d NYCO29708 +.... NYCO29710 + ....Ii NYCO29711 +.... b NYCO29713 This is everything that I have received from the FBI. Everything that I got is now in Relativity secured for review. Thank you. From: Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2020 8:16 PM Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review Thanks so much would you please send us a screenshot of the full list of NYC numbers in the US v Epstein (SW Returns) database on Relativity when you have a chance tomorrow? From: Sent: Sunda October 4, 2020 7:10 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review I'm sorry, a brief addition — I just realized that I also have this email from -from 8/13, so it very well may be that the subsequent email referenced below was just a partial screen shot. I'm not sure! But we should be able to tell one way or the other once an let us know. From: Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2020 19:09 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review Hey, it's no bother, but I don't actually think I was involved when the uploading of the search warrant devices was completed — or at least, I don't have any record of being notified that all of the devices were ready for review on Relativity on August 27. I think I definitely didn't know that as of September 7-9, when we (the full team) corresponded with and (me and you) spoke ta because my understanding then was that we were talking then about where the devices would be foldered in Relativity once they were all loaded. The last email of the chain of which is attached here, and I'm copying in and=so everybody is in the loop. (I don't believe I have any other emails to or from since then on this particular issue.) EFTA00040540 At the time of those discussions in September, I had thought only that five of the devices had been uploaded to Relativity (or four, depending on whether "NYC024369" and "NYC024369_1" are different devices). had emailed the team that those devices were on Relativity, via screen shot, on August 27 — that message is itself attached to my email attached here. So although I don't have any reason to doubt it, I don't think I personally know if the extractions from all devices were uploaded to Relativity and ready for privilege review as of August 27th. All that said, the basic answer to your question is that I can't confirm what devices were or were not uploaded to Relativity because we can't see what has been loaded — because it's walled off for the privilege review. I think the way to confirm that would be for to send a screen shot or list of all the NYC-numbered items that have been uploaded to Relativity, and to compare those numbers against the spreadsheet you created for the devices (and/or the spreadsheet from the most recent version of that that I have is also attached). Which should hopefully be relatively easy to do! Anybody should please let me know if that doesn't make sense, or if any questions, disagreements, or issues? And I'm happy to do whatever additional follow-up would be useful. thanks, From: Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2020 21:08 To: Cc: Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review very sorry to bother you with this, but would you be able to step in and help confirm that all of the devices from Mihave been loaded to Relativity? My understanding was that was all done before you transitioned fully off the case. From: Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 9:02 PM To Cc Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review Hi I'm well, thanks, hope you are too. Thanks for the tracker. Are these devices all from Maxell or Epstein? If any are from Maxwell, can you send me a list of her known attorneys? I'll take a look at the Apple extractions tomorrow and let you know how much data is on each and how long the review should take and how much help I'll need. Unfortunately I did not know until I just got your email and tracker that data had been loaded onto Relativity. I usually get an email when data is loaded but I can't find one. I will run the terms as soon I can. Thanks= From: Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2020 8:28 PM To: Cc: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein devices - privilege review Hi Hope you're doing well. I wanted to check in on the privilege review for the devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein. For reference, attached is a search warrant tracker. Our understanding is that you received the extractions from the Apple devices from the drive sent you via FedEx on August 25th, and that the extractions from the remaining devices were uploaded to Relativity and ready for privilege review on August 27th. Our understanding is that you're using the attached privilege terms to complete the privilege review, but please let us know if there is anything more you need for the review. Our discovery deadline for the Maxwell case is November 9th, so we are hoping that the privilege review can be completed early this month to allow time for a responsiveness review before we make productions. Thanks so much for all of your help. EFTA00040541 EFTA00040542

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.