Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00065489DOJ Data Set 9Other

U.S. Department of Justice

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00065489
Pages
2
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Office of the Assistant MOM,' General Washington. D.C. 20530 Oct 12, 2021 The Honorable Audrey Strauss United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrews Plaza New York, NY 10007 Attention: Re: Witness Immunity Authorization Dear Ms. Strauss: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by 18 U.S.C. § 6003(b) and 28 C.F.R. § 0.175(a). I hereby approve your request for authority to apply to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for an order, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 6002-6003, requiring to give testimony or provide other information in the above matter and in any further proceedings resulting therefrom or ancillary thereto, provided that the witness refuses to testify or provide information on the basis of the privilege against self-incrimination. Sincerely, Deputy Assistant Attorney General EFTA00065489 EFTA00065490

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Office of the Assistant MOM,' General Washington. D.C. 20530 Oct 12, 2021 The Honorable Audrey Strauss United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrews Plaza New York, NY 10007 Attention: Re: Witness Immunity Authorization Dear Ms. Strauss: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by 18 U.S.C. § 6003(b) and 28 C.F.R. § 0.175(a). I hereby approve your request for authority to apply to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for an order, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 6002-6003, requiring to give testimony or provide other information in the above matter and in any further proceedings resulting therefrom or ancillary thereto, provided that the witness refuses to testify or provide information on the basis of the privilege against self-incrimination. Sincerely, Deputy Assistant Attorney General EFTA00065489 EFTA00065490

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

L49KNEWM

1 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. 20 CV 833 (PAE) Remote Conference FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. Before: x New York, N.Y. April 9, 2021 4:00 p.m. HON. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge APPEARANCES THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY BY: DAVID EDWARD McCRAW ALEXANDRA SETTELMAYER AUDREY STRAUSS, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York STEVEN J. KOCHEVAR Assistant United States Attorney ALSO PRESENT: KARA CHRISTENSON, BOP SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00105705 2 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (The Court and all parties appearing telephonically) THE COURT: Good afternoon. This is Judge Engelmayer. Let me begin by asking my law clerk to confirm that all counsel are on th

74p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,

74p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

L49KNEWM

1 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. 20 CV 833 (PAE) Remote Conference FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. Before: x New York, N.Y. April 9, 2021 4:00 p.m. HON. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge APPEARANCES THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY BY: DAVID EDWARD McCRAW ALEXANDRA SETTELMAYER AUDREY STRAUSS, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney ALSO PRESENT: ,BOP SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00105779 2 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (The Court and all parties appearing telephonically) THE COURT: Good afternoon. This is Judge Engelmayer. Let me begin by asking my law clerk to confirm that all counsel are on the line. THE LAW CLERK: Hi, Judge. T

74p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NORTHERN (WEST PALM BEACH) DIVISION FGJ 07-103(WPB) IN RE: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED ORDER On Application of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court: 1. That has been called to testify and to provide other information before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, including a Grand Jury impanelled therein; and 2. That in the judgment of the said United States Attorney, has refused to testify and provide other information on the basis of her privilege against self-incrimination; and 3. That in the judgment of the said United States Attorney, the testimony and other information from may be necessary to the public interest; and 4. That the aforesaid Application has been made with the approval of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice or a duly designa

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FBI PUBLIC AFFAIRS - DIRECTOR'S AM NEWS BRIEFING

FBI PUBLIC AFFAIRS - DIRECTOR'S AM NEWS BRIEFING WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2019 5:00 AM EDT Three Arrested In Domestic Terror Threats Across US On Tuesday. David Muir opened ABC World News Tonight (8/20, lead story, 2:30, 6.49M) 'with the disturbing new headline, after El Paso and Dayton: tonight, news of three new threats, three new arrests. Authorities say these threats of mass shootings in three separate states. Police in Florida handcuffing this 15-year-old boy with his mother by his side. He is accused of threatening to take his father's assault-style weapon to school to shoot several other people." ABC's Victor Oquendo reported, "In Indianapolis, 38-year-old truck driver Thomas Matthew McVicker was arrested. Authorities say they stopped him less than a week before he planned on attacking a church in Memphis. ... And in Seattle, 35-year-old Eric Lin was arrested for allegedly writing on Facebook that he would 'kill all Hispanic Hispanics in Miami and other places.' These thre

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.