Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00066343DOJ Data Set 9Other

IPTS Recommends Detention?]

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00066343
Pages
5
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

BAIL IPTS Recommends Detention?] Presumption 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c) S (f) Rebuttable Presumption for detention: pi drug crimes; (ii] § 9244c) violations; and (iii] previously convicted of a crime of violence Strength of Case confession, taped recordings, statements pre-conviction: § 3142(g) post-conviction: S 3143 5 3142(q) Factors 1. Nature and circumstances of offense charge:. crime of violence / drugs / mandatory minimums 2. Weight of evidence 3. .History and characteristics of defendant (A) character; physical/mental condition; family/community ties; employment; financial resources; substance abuse; criminal history; past court appearances (B) at time of offense/arrest, defendant connected to criminal justice system -- parole/SR, trial, sentencing 4. Nature/seriousness of danger to. person or community Risk of Flight "preponderance" use of alias lack of ties to community citizenship SSNs /. DOBs bench warrants.-- check returns mandatory minimums if ap

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
BAIL IPTS Recommends Detention?] Presumption 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c) S (f) Rebuttable Presumption for detention: pi drug crimes; (ii] § 9244c) violations; and (iii] previously convicted of a crime of violence Strength of Case confession, taped recordings, statements pre-conviction: § 3142(g) post-conviction: S 3143 5 3142(q) Factors 1. Nature and circumstances of offense charge:. crime of violence / drugs / mandatory minimums 2. Weight of evidence 3. .History and characteristics of defendant (A) character; physical/mental condition; family/community ties; employment; financial resources; substance abuse; criminal history; past court appearances (B) at time of offense/arrest, defendant connected to criminal justice system -- parole/SR, trial, sentencing 4. Nature/seriousness of danger to. person or community Risk of Flight "preponderance" use of alias lack of ties to community citizenship SSNs /. DOBs bench warrants.-- check returns mandatory minimums if applicable / rough guidelines calculation Danger to Community "clear and convincing" prior convictions violence / drugs- use of weapons instant offense economic danger to community vulnerable victim -- child, elderly, handicap EFTA00066343 esented w/in terviewed by tions: 3143 Conditions:. it Arguments PRESENTMENT' / BAIL / DETENTION Rule 5, Rule 9, Rule 32.1(VOSR) 24 hours (on 3-day wkend, ask supervisor); Pre-Trial, Lawyer appointed/retained Booked by Marshals, Release on personal recognizance; Bond (if no reasonable condition) Travel restrictions, drug testing, live w/mom,etc; Can't set financial conditions that result in pre-trial detention 53142(9)(1)(4) factors t. hearing §3142(a)(1) Duttable presump: c detention: indard of proof: :imately, det. is: appropriate for peal 1 case: nged circa: lation of bail: post-plea: post-appeal: ignor questions: Drug "Danger to Community" - on Gov't's motion; career offender, crime of violence (e.g. gun possession, escape, sex crimes involving minors). "Risk of Flight" - Gov't not necess'ly entitled to hearing; but prob could argue both flight 4 danger Crimes; §924(c) violation; Prey crime of violence cony Safety burden is "clear and convincing" Flight burden is "preponderance" Guns, Drugs, Prior convictions showing little regard for court instructions; Aliens subject to deportation; Can't identify D; D on probation. If bail ordered, gov't disagrees, go to Part I Judge; request a stay at hearing pending Part I Judge. If not same day, get tape of hearing transcribed (Joel Blum). Part .I Judge reviews de novo. Make bail argument again. If arrested in different district and gets bail (but you want detention), go to Part I Judge here; ask other AUSA to get a stay. Or get a stay from Part I Judge here pending removal to this district Can't appeal DCT's decision, but can re-open issue if new evidence, or D lost suppression motion, etc. Changed circs can be proximity to trial. §3148. Seek bench warrant. Hearing held to determine if probable cause that D committed crime, or clear 4 convincing evidence that D viol'd term or condition. Judge must determine that D unlikely to abide by cond's or no reas'ble cond. will assure D's presence. Rebuttable presumption for detention where committed crime. Burden shifts as to both flight & danger. §3145: if exceptional reasons D kept out on bail for drug or violence case which otherwise would require remand- Cooperation may be exceptional reason; D's personal probs not exceptional reason Should be remanded after sent unless potential for reversal Don't let counsel or rep be there; co-signors knowledge of D's involvement in crime relevant to moral suasion & finan responsibility; If signor may become witness, don't approve; Can ask ?'s about crime b/c can't co-sign 4 be a witness or doesn't have moral suasion EFTA00066344 BAIL: 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) In light of the 3142(g) factors, the Government submits that [the presumption is overcome / the defendant cannot overcome the presumption], and accordingly that detention is warranted. In particular, we submit that [a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that the defendant is a flight risk / that clear and convincing evidence demonstrates that the defendant is a danger to the community]. (1): NATURE & CIRCUMSTANCES OF CHARGED OFFENSE (Violence; Terrorism; Minor Victim; Controlled Substance; Firearm; Explosive) (2): WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE (3): HISTORY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DEFENDANT (A): Character; Physical/Mental Condition; Family Ties; Financial Condition; Length of Residence; Community Ties; Past Conduct; Drug/Alcohol History; Criminal History; History of Appearances at Court. (B): At time of offense, under federal or state supervision (pre- or post-trial) (4):DANGER TO ANY PERSON OR THE COMMUNITY EFTA00066345 ARGUMENTS Standard under 18 U.S.C. & 3142(O: If no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure appearance of defendant as required and safety of any other person or the community, defendant should be detained before trial. Rebuttable nresumntion uner 18 U.S.C. & 3142(4 in drug cases with 10 yr. max., or 924(c) cases, certain cases involving minors — it's presumed that no condition or combo of conditions will assure appearance and safety; it's up to defense counsel to rebut A. Risk of Flight 1. Strength of case (likelihood of conviction) — confession, tapes, wiretaps, undercover deals 2. Potential penalties: a. emphasize mandatory minimums, high guidelines b. collateral consequences of arrest/conviction (e.g. deportation 3. Outstanding bench warrants or prior bench warrants 4. False info to PTS (or info not corroborated) 5. Conflict of PTS info w/ info to arresting agents, marshals 6. Aliases, multiple DOBs, SSNs, addresses from rap sheet (emphasize ability to bide identity and location) 7. Lack of community ties family intact? short period of residence in city lack of employment/brief employment 8. Ties to other communities alien status relatives/associates elsewhere regular travel 9. Assets giving ability to flee 10. Ability to make/obtain documents to flee (e.g. passport) 11. Other EFTA00066346 • • • 1 B. • atinangis 1. Nature of Offense (e.g., violence, threats, drug dealing) 2. Criminal History crimes of violence past drug dealing crimes while on bail crimes while on probation 3. Currently under supervision (or on bail) 4. Tested positive for drugs by PTS 5. Drug use or addiction w/o employment (reflects need to commit crimes to support habit) 6. Threats to witnesses 7. Other: B. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE: REPLY: EFTA00066347

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

j782epsC kjc

j782epsC kjc UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x New York, N.Y. 19 Cr. 490(RMB) Conference July 8, 2019 1:20 p.m. HON. HENRY B. PITMAN, APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorneys STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP Attorneys for Defendant BY: REID H. WEINGARTEN MARTIN G. WEINBERG Attorney for Defendant MARC FERNICH Attorney for Defendant Also Present: Special Agent Detective FBI , NYPD Magistrate Judge SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00079704 j782epsC kjc 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Case called) THE DEPUTY CLERK: Counsel, please state your name for the record. MR. : Good afternoon, your Honor. For the government, , and With us are Special

24p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court order establishes rules for the Defendant, Defense Counsel, and designated individuals to ...

The court order establishes rules for the Defendant, Defense Counsel, and designated individuals to handle discovery materials, including confidentiality requirements and procedures for sharing with potential witnesses. It differentiates between general discovery materials and 'Highly Confidential Information', imposing stricter controls on the latter. The order aims to balance the Defendant's right to prepare their defense with the need to protect sensitive information.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 214 Filed 04/19/21 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 4/19/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: An arraignment on the S2 Superseding Indictment is scheduled to take place on April 23, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. The proceeding will take place in Courtroom 24B of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY. Given significant public interest, a video feed of the proceeding will be available for viewing in the Jury Assembly Room and Courtroom 9C at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse. The use of any electronic devices during the proceeding in either the Courtroom or the overflow rooms is strictly prohibited. Due to social distancing requirements, seating will be limited to approximately 100 members of the public. If capacity is reached, no ad

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Motto Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 28, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter with respect to the protective order to be entered in the above-captioned case, and to respond to the defendant's letter and submission of July 27, 2020 (the "Defendant Letter" or "Def. Ltr.") (Dkt. 29). The Government and defense counsel have conferred regarding a protective order several times via telephone and email between July 9, 2020, and today, including as recently as this morning. The Government and defense counsel have come to an agreement on much of the proposed protective order. However, the parties

7p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.