Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00066941DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Aida Leisenring <

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00066941
Pages
3
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: Aida Leisenring < To: Michael Bachrach < Cc: Bruce Barket < Subject: RE: US v. Tartaglione Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 21:39:24 +0000 Hello Jason and Maurene, We second the request for a copy from the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office to provide defense counsel in this case with the MCC legal visit logs that you now have in your possession. In the interest of making a complete record of this death-authorized case, we are also requesting a copy from the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office of the Inmate Count logs you also indicated that you have in your possession. Thank you and have a good weekend. Best, Aida Ferrer Leisenring, Esq. Barket, Epstein, Kearon, Aldea & LoTurco LLP Please note that my emailed has changed to: This transmittal may be a confidential attorney client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmit

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Aida Leisenring < To: Michael Bachrach < Cc: Bruce Barket < Subject: RE: US v. Tartaglione Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 21:39:24 +0000 Hello Jason and Maurene, We second the request for a copy from the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office to provide defense counsel in this case with the MCC legal visit logs that you now have in your possession. In the interest of making a complete record of this death-authorized case, we are also requesting a copy from the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office of the Inmate Count logs you also indicated that you have in your possession. Thank you and have a good weekend. Best, Aida Ferrer Leisenring, Esq. Barket, Epstein, Kearon, Aldea & LoTurco LLP Please note that my emailed has changed to: This transmittal may be a confidential attorney client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you suspect that you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: Michael Bachrach < Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 10:20 AM To: Cc: Bruce Barket <[email protected]>; Aida Leisenring john diaz < ); Subject: Re: US v. Tartaglione Jason and Maurene, cza EFTA00066941 Following up on our conference call from yesterday, please ask the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office or firewall counsel assigned to this case (Margery Feinzig and Ilan Graff) to provide defense counsel in this case with the MCC attorney/legal visitation logs that you now have in your possession, specifically the attorney/legal visitation logs relating to visits of Nicholas Tartaglione (#78514-054). We appreciate your agreement not to review these records for substance and to handle them through firewall or other similar counsel. Also, just to clarify, in preparation for your Office's response to the NY Times FOIA request, did you obtain additional BOP records (besides Tartaglione's visitation logs) that relate to the penalty phase of our case, which we haven't previously reviewed or received? If so, please provide that additional information to us as well. Thank you for your assistance. --Michael Michael K. Bachrach, Es M EST, < wrote: Yes, that works for us. Let's use this dial-in: 844-215-6902 605267 From: Michael Bachrach Sent: Tuesda Januar 5. 2021 9:36 AM To: Cc: Subject: Re: US v. Tartaglione Hi Jason. Aida Leisenring john diaz EFTA00066942 Happy New Year to you as well. How's Thursday at 1:30 pm for the call? Both retained and appointed counsel are available at that date and time. --Michael Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 12:24 PM, All, Happy New Year and hope everyone is staying healthy. We would like to discuss an issue with you related to the Protective Order previously entered in this case regarding BOP documents (Dkt No. 119). Would you please huddle up and let us know some dates/times this week where at least one member of the retained team and one member of learned counsel are available for a call. Thanks, Deputy Chief, White Plains Division United States Attorneys Office Southern District of New York EFTA00066943

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

L49KNEWM

1 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. 20 CV 833 (PAE) Remote Conference FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. Before: x New York, N.Y. April 9, 2021 4:00 p.m. HON. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge APPEARANCES THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY BY: DAVID EDWARD McCRAW ALEXANDRA SETTELMAYER AUDREY STRAUSS, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York STEVEN J. KOCHEVAR Assistant United States Attorney ALSO PRESENT: KARA CHRISTENSON, BOP SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00105705 2 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (The Court and all parties appearing telephonically) THE COURT: Good afternoon. This is Judge Engelmayer. Let me begin by asking my law clerk to confirm that all counsel are on th

74p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

L49KNEWM

1 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. 20 CV 833 (PAE) Remote Conference FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. Before: x New York, N.Y. April 9, 2021 4:00 p.m. HON. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge APPEARANCES THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY BY: DAVID EDWARD McCRAW ALEXANDRA SETTELMAYER AUDREY STRAUSS, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney ALSO PRESENT: ,BOP SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00105779 2 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (The Court and all parties appearing telephonically) THE COURT: Good afternoon. This is Judge Engelmayer. Let me begin by asking my law clerk to confirm that all counsel are on the line. THE LAW CLERK: Hi, Judge. T

74p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

90A-NY-3151227 Serial 64

90A-NY-3151227 Serial 64 FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10) •1 of 1. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of entry 08/28/2019 On August 16, 2019, at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) III , New York, NY, Special Agent (SA) , SA , TFO , OIG Investigator and MCC Lt. interviewed LEONARDO FERNANDEZ, MCC Inmate #86824-054. After being advised of the identities of the agents and the purpose of the interview, FERNANDEZ provided the following information: On Friday (August 09, 2019), FERNANDEZ was housed in Cell 218 on L-TIER of the Special Housing Unit within MCC. He received a visit from his girlfriend, TYRELYSHANTI CRIAG, that day. He was suspected of receiving contraband at the visit and was placed in the dry room for approximately 25 hours. FERNANDEZ was then moved to K tier Cell 111. FERNANDEZ last day being housed in L Tier was Friday (August 9, 2019) prior to his visit. FERNANDEZ remembers that JEFFREY EPSTEIN would be in legal from approximately 9am to 9pm and he was

476p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject:

From: To: Subject: - u is airs ews ne Ing e nes ay, u y 29, 2020 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:25:50 +0000 c Importan e: Normal Mobile version and searchable archives available at fbi.bulletinintelligence.com. 1B1 News Briefing TO: THE DIRECTOR AND SENIOR STAFF DATE: WEDNESDAY, JULY 29, 2020 6:30 AM EDT TODAY'S TABLE OF CONTENTS LEADING THE NEWS • Barr Spars With Democrats At Contentious House Hearing. • Barr Says Democrats Have Tried To "Discredit" Him. • Barr Says Bash Investigating "High Number Of Unmaskings" During Obama Administration. PROTESTS • Memo Reveals Federal Agents Sought Role In Suppressing Protests Since Start. • New Mexico Governor Addresses Concerns About Federal Agents In Albuquerque. • Report: US, Oregon In Talks About Pulling Agents From Portland. • Portland Fines Federal Government For Unpermitted Fence Outside Courthouse. • US Park Police Head: Decision To Clear Protesters Not Linked To Trump "Photo Op." • Hundreds Of Cases Involving LAPD Off

47p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Motto Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 28, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter with respect to the protective order to be entered in the above-captioned case, and to respond to the defendant's letter and submission of July 27, 2020 (the "Defendant Letter" or "Def. Ltr.") (Dkt. 29). The Government and defense counsel have conferred regarding a protective order several times via telephone and email between July 9, 2020, and today, including as recently as this morning. The Government and defense counsel have come to an agreement on much of the proposed protective order. However, the parties

7p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.