Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00067055Other

U.S. Department of Justice

Date
Unknown
Source
Reference
EFTA 00067055
Pages
5
Persons
7
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 November 13, 2020 By Email and USAfx Samuel Gregory, Esq. Law Offices of Samuel Gregory, P.C. Lloyd Epstein min Re: United States v. Robert Adams, No. 20 Cr. 494 (PGG) Dear Counsel: This letter provides additional discovery pursuant to Rule 16(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This letter and the materials identified herein are subject to the protective order entered in this case on October 15, 2020, and have been designated as "Protected Materials" as defined in the order where noted below. Accordingly, the materials and information identified herein shall not be disclosed to any third party except as set forth in the protective order. Description Bates Numbers Classification Pursuant to Protective Order Materials from Robert Adams interview dated August 16, 2019 SDNY_RA_00000704 — SDNY_RA_0

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 November 13, 2020 By Email and USAfx Samuel Gregory, Esq. Law Offices of Samuel Gregory, P.C. Lloyd Epstein min Re: United States v. Robert Adams, No. 20 Cr. 494 (PGG) Dear Counsel: This letter provides additional discovery pursuant to Rule 16(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This letter and the materials identified herein are subject to the protective order entered in this case on October 15, 2020, and have been designated as "Protected Materials" as defined in the order where noted below. Accordingly, the materials and information identified herein shall not be disclosed to any third party except as set forth in the protective order. Description Bates Numbers Classification Pursuant to Protective Order Materials from Robert Adams interview dated August 16, 2019 SDNY_RA_00000704 — SDNY_RA_00000705 Robert Adams vehicle workup SDNY_RA_00000706 — SDNY_RA_00000736 Collected item logs SDNY_RA_00000737 -- SDNY_RA_00000745 Evidence receipts SDNY_RA_00000746 -- SDNY_RA_00000767' BOP records SDNY_RA_00000770 -- SDNY_RA_00000783 ' Please note that the bates range SDNY_RA_00000768 through SDNY_RA_00000769 has been omitted. 06.20.2018 EFTA00067055 Page 2 Whitestone Motel records SDNY_RA_00000784 -- SDNY_RA_00000939; SDNY_RA_00001638 — SDNY_RA_00002533 MCC records SDNY_RA_00000940 -- SDNY_RA_00001313 MCC surveillance footage SDNY_RA_00001314 -- SDNY_RA_00001322 Metrocard records SDNY_RA_00001323 -- SDNY_RA_00001332 Photographs SDNY_RA_00001333 -- SDNY_RA_00001343 Search warrant for historical cellsite data for the cellphone number dated November 5, 2019 SDNY_RA_00001344 -- SDNY_RA_00001359 N ile records for the phone numbe responsive to a search warrant dated November 5, 2019 (19 Mag. 10436) SDNY_RA_00001360 -- SDNY_RA_00001365 Sprint records for the phone number- responsive to a search warrant dated August 19, 2019 (19 Mag. 7762) SDNY_RA_00001366 -- SDNY_RA_00001371 Verizon records for the phone number _responsive to a search warrant dated August 21, 2019 (19 Mag. 7836) SDNY_RA_00001372 -- SDNY_RA_00001395 Magic Auto Sales for an account in the name of Robert Adams SDNY_RA_00001396 -- SDNY_RA_00001403 Transunion records for an account in the name of Robert Adams SDNY_RA_00001404 -- SDNY_RA_00001416 Law enforcement searches SDNY_RA_00001417 Responsive materials from Robert Adams' cellphone SDNY_RA_00001418 -- SDNY_RA_00001511 Responsive materials from Visitor- 1 ' s phone SDNY_RA_00001512 -- SDNY_RA_00001637 The Government has now produced to you relevant portions of the MCC's visitors logbook. Should you wish to physically inspect the logbook, we can arrange for you to do so at the FBI's offices at 26 Federal Plaza. Similarly, we have produced to you relevant portions of the MCC's video surveillance footage from July 5, 2019. Should you wish you receive additional footage from that day, please provide us with a 32 gigabyte disc. In addition, we wish to advise you of the following: On or about August 16, 2019, in connection with an investigation into the circumstances of the death of Jeffrey Epstein, a paralegal at the U.S. Attorney's Office spoke to the defendant by 06.20.2018 EFTA00067056 Page 3 telephone. On that call, the defendant stated, in sum and substance, the following: he was working on August 16 to 8 p.m. or 10 p.m.; his days off were Monday and Tuesday; his schedule on weekends was varied, and on August 17 and August 18 he was working from 8 a.m. to 12 a.m.; and on the next Wednesday he would be working from 12 p.m. to 8 p.m. The defendant also stated, in sum and substance, that the number for the control room at the MCC was- and that his cellphone number was On or about September 28, 2020, after he was arrested and released from FBI custody, and as the FBI special agents were walking the defendant out of the courthouse, they discussed what was open to get something to eat. The defendant stated he wanted to go to the food cart located outside of 60 Centre Street, New York, New York. When the FBI special agents and the defendant approached the corner of Pearl Street and Centre Street, the defendant stated that the food cart was not there. One of the FBI special agents stated that he was going to go to the deli/pizzeria at the corner of Duane Street and Lafayette Street. The defendant stated that the special agents should try Luna Pizzeria located near the MCC. The defendant further stated that there was a girl who worked at Luna Pizzeria who was "easy on the eyes." The Government interviewed Visitor-1, who is represented by counsel, on or about August 14, 2019, August 22, 2019, September 12, 2019, and February 12, 2020.2 Among other things, Visitor-1 has stated the following, in substance and in part: The defendant told Visitor-1 that the defendant threw away the contraband that Visitor-1 brought to the MCC on or about July 5, 2019. The defendant told Visitor-1 not to bring drugs to the MCC anymore. Visitor-1 was afraid that the defendant would get Visitor-1 in trouble if she did, and as a result, did not bring drugs during subsequent visits when she believed the defendant was working. On a subsequent visit to the MCC, the defendant told Visitor-I, in substance and in part, that Visitor-1 was having a "dry month," which Visitor-1 understood to mean that Visitor-1 was not making money because Visitor-1 was not bringing any contraband into the MCC. In a text message dated on or about July 26, 2019, which has been produced in discovery, Visitor- I wrote, in substance and in part, that "the fed was there he blowing mines." Visitor-I has told the Government, in substance and in part, that Visitor-1 was trying to convey that the defendant prevented Visitor-1 from visiting Inmate-1 and was describing a sense of frustration. In a text message dated July 26, 2019, which has been produced in discovery, Visitor-1 wrote, in substance and in part, "I'm headed home I bagged one of the feds he said he 2 The Government intends to disclose the names of the witnesses referenced herein in advance of trial along with other Giglio and Jencks Act materials. The Government is available to discuss a schedule for those disclosures at your convenience. 06.20.2018 EFTA00067057 Page 4 might give me money." Visitor-1 has told the Government, in substance and in part, that she used the term "bagged" as slang for getting the defendant's telephone number, and denied that "bagged" meant to have sexual intercourse with someone; that Visitor-1 was attempting to act as if obtaining the defendant's phone number was Visitor-I's choice; and that she planned to obtain money from the defendant, as she frequently tried to obtain money from men with whom she was having sexual relations. On one occasion when Visitor-I attempted to visit Inmate-1 following the July 5, 2019 incident, the defendant told Visitor-1 that Visitor-I could not see Inmate-1 because something was going on inside the MCC. Visitor-1 learned from another MCC visitor that visiting was stopped because there was a fight among inmates. However, Visitor-1 suspected that the defendant may have intentionally prevented Visitor-1 from seeing Inmate-1. Visitor-1 believed that the defendant fabricated a reason to prevent Visitor-1 from visiting Inmate-1 because she believed that the defendant was romantically interested in her. Visitor-1 told an individual who provided contraband for Visitor-1 to bring to the MCC ("Individual-1") , that a MCC correctional officer did not facilitate Visitor-1's efforts to smuggle contraband into the MCC. On or about August 21, 2019, the Government interviewed an inmate at the MCC ("Inmate-2"), who is represented by counsel. Among other things, Inmate-2 stated, in sum and substance, the following: an inmate known as "Lucky" went to the visiting floor to get contraband, and after the defendant intercepted that contraband, he told "Lucky" that he was going to flush it down a toilet. On or about September 13, 2019, the Government interviewed an inmate at the MCC ("Inmate-3"), who is represented by counsel. Among other things, Inmate-3 stated, in sum and substance, the following: Inmate-3 never heard about the defendant being involved in smuggling contraband. On or about September 27, 2019, the Government interviewed a former MCC inmate ("Inmate-4") . Among other things, Inmate-4 stated, in substance and in part, the following: everybody at the MCC respected the defendant; that Inmate-4 was unaware of any issues with the defendant or issues with the defendant being too friendly with visiting wives or girlfriends; and the defendant was very friendly with the visitors and inmates at the MCC. On or about October 16, 2019, the Government interviewed a MCC Correctional Officer ("CO-1"). Among other things, CO-1 stated, in substance and in part, the following: CO-1 did not believe that the defendant would let any inmates or visitors slide or do favors for them; CO-1 never experienced a situation where an inmate or visitor was causing trouble and the defendant told CO- I to let it go; that the defendant did his strip searches of inmates out in the open, unlike other dirty correctional officers who did their searches while looking over their shoulder to see who was coming; and that the defendant did not try to chat up or flirt with women who visited the MCC. 06.20.2018 EFTA00067058 Page 5 On or about October 17, 2019, the Government interviewed an MCC supervisor ("Supervisor-1"). Among other things, Supervisor-1 stated, in substance and in part, the following: the defendant told Supervisor-1 that the defendant has a heart issue, has been going through a tough time with his wife, had been excessively drinking, and denied the allegations made against him by Visitor-1. On or about October 30, 2019, the Government interviewed an individual who had visited an inmate at the MCC ("Visitor-2"). Visitor-2 was shown the photographic array that was previously produced to you in discovery (SDNY_RA_00000698-SDNY_RA_00000703). Among other things, Visitor-2 stated, in substance and in part, that the individual in the fifth photograph was the defendant, whom Visitor-2 described as professional and nice. On or about November 26, 2019, the Government interviewed an individual ("Individual- 2"), who was shown the photographic array that was previously produced to you in discovery (SDNY_RA_00000698-SDNY_RA_00000703). Among other things, Individual-2 stated, in substance and in part, that the individual in the fifth photograph was the defendant, with whom Indiivudal-1 grew up with and last had contact in July 2019 during a wedding. Very truly yours, AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York By: Assistant United States Attorneys 06.20.2018 EFTA00067059

Related Documents (6)

OtherUnknown

Juror ID:

FINAL Juror ID: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -V- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. INSTRUCTION SHEET Dear Juror: X 20 Cr. 330 (MN) JURY QUESTIONNAIRE Please call on November 15, 2021 after 6:00 p.m. for further reporting instructions. Please bring this instruction sheet with you to the courthouse if you are instructed to return. -1- EFTA00077967 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY JURY ASSEMBLY ROOM 160 SECTION I: JUROR INFORMATION ALL FIELDS IN THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED TO ENSURE YOU RECEIVE YOUR PAYMENT FOR SERVICE Full Name: •Address: Home Phone # Last Fiat M I. Street Address City State Zip Code Aportment/Unit Business Phone I Cell Phone I *NO P.O. BOXES. YOU MUST PROVIDE A RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS FOR MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT. Social Security # PLEASE SELECT ONE NOTE: ATTENDANCE LETTERS WILL BE MAILED 21 DAYS AFTER SERVICE PRINT ATTENDANCE LET

31p
OtherUnknown

Ces2e.29-12,407413r3cliAlienDtidutinEl t310282 if663615/233/2174ig Plage aoat 9

Ces2e.29-12,407413r3cliAlienDtidutinEl t310282 if663615/233/2174ig Plage aoat 9 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN July 29, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P C Ty Gee 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 HI 303.832.2628 www.hmllaw.com [email protected] Re: Reconsideration of the Court's July 23 Ruling Giuffie v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: As counsel for Ms. Maxwell we write to request that the Court vindicate its Protective Order and punish its violation. Ms. Maxwell's two deposition transcripts were designated "Confidential" and subject to the protection of the Protective Order. Both transcripts ended up in the hands of the government, which used them to bring an indictment against Ms. Maxwell, charging her with, among other things, perjury in her deposition testimony. This is a serious violation

209p
OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,

74p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

L49KNEWM

1 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. 20 CV 833 (PAE) Remote Conference FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. Before: x New York, N.Y. April 9, 2021 4:00 p.m. HON. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge APPEARANCES THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY BY: DAVID EDWARD McCRAW ALEXANDRA SETTELMAYER AUDREY STRAUSS, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney ALSO PRESENT: ,BOP SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00105779 2 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (The Court and all parties appearing telephonically) THE COURT: Good afternoon. This is Judge Engelmayer. Let me begin by asking my law clerk to confirm that all counsel are on the line. THE LAW CLERK: Hi, Judge. T

74p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1078-5 Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 161

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1078-5 Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 161 EXHIBIT E EFTA00084366 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1078-5 Filed 07/29/20 Page 2 of 161 New Jeffrey Epstein accuser says he molested her at 13, told her to wear children's underwear January 18.2020 I 12-04am I Updated Jeffrey Epstein A woman claiming she was Jeffrey Epstein's "first-known victim" says she was sexually abused by the now-dead pedophile — who called himself her "Godfather" — when she was 13 years old. Jane Doe met Epstein and his friend, Ghislaine Maxwell. in the summer of 1994 at Michigan's Interlochen Arts Camp, where she was In voice training, according to newly filed court papers suing Epstein's estate and Maxwell. The duo quickly took her under their wing, taking her to movies and on shopping trips in her home state of Florida and all the while grooming her for abuse, the Manhattan federal court suit says. Epstein "started to slowly display his pedophilic ways when shopping with Doe

161p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

L49KNEWM

1 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. 20 CV 833 (PAE) Remote Conference FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. Before: x New York, N.Y. April 9, 2021 4:00 p.m. HON. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge APPEARANCES THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY BY: DAVID EDWARD McCRAW ALEXANDRA SETTELMAYER AUDREY STRAUSS, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York STEVEN J. KOCHEVAR Assistant United States Attorney ALSO PRESENT: KARA CHRISTENSON, BOP SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00105705 2 L49KNEWM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (The Court and all parties appearing telephonically) THE COURT: Good afternoon. This is Judge Engelmayer. Let me begin by asking my law clerk to confirm that all counsel are on th

74p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.