Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00068334DOJ Data Set 9Other

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

COHEN & GRESSER LLP October 1, 2020 BY EMAIL Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write once again to express our dissatisfaction that the government still has not provided a complete set of readable discovery materials to Ms. Maxwell in the MDC. We have now had several phone calls and emails to discuss the problems with the discovery, but the problems still are not fixed. It is now over five weeks since the August 21 discovery deadline set by the court and the government still has not met its discovery obligations. That is simply not acceptable. In our previous letter, dated September 21, 2020, we outlined for you the numerous problems that Ms. Maxwell had been having with unreadable discovery files since she first began receiving the government's productions in the MDC in August 2020. This was a continuation of the same problem we identified for you in our letter, dated August 27, 2020, when we requested a new set of the discovery materials

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00068334
Pages
3
Persons
4
Integrity

Summary

COHEN & GRESSER LLP October 1, 2020 BY EMAIL Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write once again to express our dissatisfaction that the government still has not provided a complete set of readable discovery materials to Ms. Maxwell in the MDC. We have now had several phone calls and emails to discuss the problems with the discovery, but the problems still are not fixed. It is now over five weeks since the August 21 discovery deadline set by the court and the government still has not met its discovery obligations. That is simply not acceptable. In our previous letter, dated September 21, 2020, we outlined for you the numerous problems that Ms. Maxwell had been having with unreadable discovery files since she first began receiving the government's productions in the MDC in August 2020. This was a continuation of the same problem we identified for you in our letter, dated August 27, 2020, when we requested a new set of the discovery materials

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
COHEN & GRESSER LLP October 1, 2020 BY EMAIL Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write once again to express our dissatisfaction that the government still has not provided a complete set of readable discovery materials to Ms. Maxwell in the MDC. We have now had several phone calls and emails to discuss the problems with the discovery, but the problems still are not fixed. It is now over five weeks since the August 21 discovery deadline set by the court and the government still has not met its discovery obligations. That is simply not acceptable. In our previous letter, dated September 21, 2020, we outlined for you the numerous problems that Ms. Maxwell had been having with unreadable discovery files since she first began receiving the government's productions in the MDC in August 2020. This was a continuation of the same problem we identified for you in our letter, dated August 27, 2020, when we requested a new set of the discovery materials that were fully readable. On September 22, 2020, we had a conference call to discuss these issues. On that call, you stated that you were trying to address the readability problems, but that in the meantime, defense counsel could, among other things, create a laptop computer with a full copy of the discovery saved locally that defense counsel could bring to the MDC so that Ms. Maxwell could use it to review the unreadable discovery. You also notified us that there were approximately 40,000 non- nude photographs and images, and thousands of nude or partially nude images, which had been seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the Virgin Islands pursuant to search warrants, and which you had referenced in your August 21, 2020 production cover letter. You further advised that you were in the process of scanning those images so that you could produce any documents not marked Highly Confidential in electronic format. Finally, in response to our request that Ms. Maxwell be given access to the Highly Confidential documents "at the earliest EFTA00068334 Page 2 possible convenience," you explained that due to COVID-19 restrictions, the U.S. Marshals are not producing pretrial detainees to proffer rooms to review discovery and therefore an FBI agent would have to bring the materials to the MDC for Ms. Maxwell and defense counsel to review, but did not propose a date when that could happen.' On September 29, 2020, we had another conference call to further discuss the discovery. We advised you that while we planned to create a laptop that we could use to review discovery with Ms. Maxwell, it was the government's burden, not the defense's burden, to ensure that Ms. Maxwell had a complete, readable copy of the discovery. Moreover, this did not solve the problem, as the laptop could only be used during counsel visits and Ms. Maxwell needed a complete set of the discovery in the MDC that she could review on her own when defense counsel was not visiting. We further notified you that we did not believe that making the thousands of images seized from Epstein's residences available for inspection at the FBI's offices satisfied the government's discovery obligations because Ms. Maxwell could not be produced to the FBI's offices to review them. You responded that defense counsel could make a request to have the FBI deliver those images to Ms. Maxwell in the MDC. In fact, we had made such a request in our September 22, 2020 letter, when we asked to schedule a time for Ms. Maxwell to review the Highly Confidential documents. That still has not happened. We made an additional request yesterday for Ms. Maxwell to be able to review the approximately 40,000 non-nude images seized from Epstein's residences as soon as possible, since these do not require defense counsel to be present for her to review them in the MDC. Your response was that these images are still being processed for production. The government has not produced these materials to Ms. Maxwell if she has no way to inspect them at the FBI's offices and they are still not ready for her to review in the MDC. Earlier today, you notified us that you have prepared a replacement set of files for the documents that Ms. Maxwell has been unable to open at the MDC and requested a hard drive from us, which we provided this afternoon. This will now be the third attempt by the government to produce a full, readable set of the discovery to Ms. Maxwell (not counting the thousands of images that are still being processed for production). Given the past attempts, we can expect that the replacement production will take several days to be made available to Ms. Maxwell in the MDC and we have little confidence that it will fix the errors when it finally arrives. Ms. Maxwell has already lost over a month of time to review these documents, and defense counsel have spent hours cataloguing the defects in the prior productions to correct the government's errors. That is not acceptable. I You also stated that you would send us a formal letter memorializing your responses to the issues raised in our September 21, 2020 letter. We have not received any letter from the government. EFTA00068335 c o er 1, Page 3 In sum, the government has not complied with its discovery obligations. We reiterate the request we made on the September 29, 2020 conference call that the government create a laptop computer, similar to the one that defense counsel is creating, which contains a complete set of the discovery and which the government has verified is fully readable, and then provide that laptop immediately to Ms. Maxwell in the MDC. We also renew our request that Ms. Maxwell be given prompt access to the non-nude images seized from Epstein's residences, and that the government propose times next week when Ms. Maxwell and defense counsel can review the Highly Confidential documents at the MDC. Thank you in advance for your attention to these matters. Sincerely, Is/ Christian Everdell Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP cc: Mark S. Cohen, Esq. Jeff Pagliuca, Esq. Laura Menninger, Esq. EFTA00068336

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferenced

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00030861

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00030934

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00020978

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Evercle11 +1 (212) 957-7600 ccvcrdclIgathcngresscr.com October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL. , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue New Yoek. NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone owswoohensresser corn We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of

8p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter from Prosecutor to Defense Counsel: 442-1

The US Attorney's Office notifies defense counsel that they intend to introduce evidence at trial showing Ghislaine Maxwell's actions to please influential men by providing them with access to women she selected. The evidence includes exhibits and testimony from a witness who worked for Jeffrey Epstein, which the prosecution argues is admissible as direct evidence or under Rule 404(b).

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

COHEN & GRESSER LLP .,:m.cohengesser <cm October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL United States Attorney's Office w York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil case proceed

8p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.