Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00068388DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "

From: " To: "Martin Ci. Weinberg" Cc: " Subject: RE: US v Epstein Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 15:10:43 +0000 Reid Weingarten < Marty, We have addressed this internally, following up on our general discussions on the subject, and what we need from the defense, please, is a formalized written request setting forth at least the following, in addition to any other information you think would be relevant for our consideration: Specifically with which what jurisdictions or parties you are requesting our (SDNY) communications be preserved or retained; Specifically which jurisdictions or parties you are requesting that we advise of your request that communications be preserved or retained; and Specifically what type of communications you are requested be preserved or maintained, in terms of the subject matter or content of the communications, for each relevant jurisdiction and/or party. It would also be useful for you to delineate, for each topic and jurisdiction, the reasons you be

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00068388
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

From: " To: "Martin Ci. Weinberg" Cc: " Subject: RE: US v Epstein Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 15:10:43 +0000 Reid Weingarten < Marty, We have addressed this internally, following up on our general discussions on the subject, and what we need from the defense, please, is a formalized written request setting forth at least the following, in addition to any other information you think would be relevant for our consideration: Specifically with which what jurisdictions or parties you are requesting our (SDNY) communications be preserved or retained; Specifically which jurisdictions or parties you are requesting that we advise of your request that communications be preserved or retained; and Specifically what type of communications you are requested be preserved or maintained, in terms of the subject matter or content of the communications, for each relevant jurisdiction and/or party. It would also be useful for you to delineate, for each topic and jurisdiction, the reasons you be

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: " To: "Martin Ci. Weinberg" Cc: " Subject: RE: US v Epstein Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 15:10:43 +0000 Reid Weingarten < Marty, We have addressed this internally, following up on our general discussions on the subject, and what we need from the defense, please, is a formalized written request setting forth at least the following, in addition to any other information you think would be relevant for our consideration: Specifically with which what jurisdictions or parties you are requesting our (SDNY) communications be preserved or retained; Specifically which jurisdictions or parties you are requesting that we advise of your request that communications be preserved or retained; and Specifically what type of communications you are requested be preserved or maintained, in terms of the subject matter or content of the communications, for each relevant jurisdiction and/or party. It would also be useful for you to delineate, for each topic and jurisdiction, the reasons you believe you would be entitled to those communications. It is not currently clear to us why the types of communications you have mentioned, irrespective of whether or not they exist, would be material to any potential defense motion. Separately, I do not expect we will be able to bind any district or party other than ourselves — but, again, once we have your full, formalized request, I expect we will be able to respond fully. In the interim, we want to again note that our understanding is that the Department of Justice has a robust retention policy for electronic communications in the normal course. thank you, Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York MEM From: Martin G. Weinberg Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 08:25 To: >; Reid Weingarten < u ject: US v Epstein did you determine whether you would advise other relevant Party's (eg the ND Ga prosecutors assigned to the CVRA case) that the defense in the SDNY has made a preservation request for all communications with SDNY, Main Justice and with any plaintiffs lawyers or their clients that relate in anyway to Mr Epstein, thanks, Marty Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. - Office EFTA00068388 - Cell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. EFTA00068389

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.