Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00072132Other

From: '

Date
Unknown
Source
Reference
EFTA 00072132
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: ' (USANYS)" alMIE> To: (USANYS)" <MIMIMIE> Cc: (USANYS)" Subject: Re: Epstein Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:56:24 +0000 Importance: Normal Am stuck on subway - may be 5 mins late. Sony. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 30, 2018, at 7:46 AM, (USANYS) <MIMMIN> wrote: > Definitely a friendly call. Good question on OEO. Is it the same lawyer in the doj suit as the suit v Epstein? I'm talking only about the Epstein suit for now. > Sent from my iPhone >> On Nov 30, 2018, at 7:41 AM, (USANYS) wrote: >> Is that going to require OEO approval? And even if not, he is litigating against DOJ - would think we'd want to make clear this is a friendly not hostile overture. >> Sent from my iPhone >>> On Nov 30, 2018, at 7:31 AM, (USANYS) <MIMMIE> wrote: >» >>> I think a way of firmly and likely publicly staking claim (which is probably the way to go here) is to subpoena the civil lawyer in case v Epstein for deposition transcripts and other materials. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhon

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' (USANYS)" alMIE> To: (USANYS)" <MIMIMIE> Cc: (USANYS)" Subject: Re: Epstein Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:56:24 +0000 Importance: Normal Am stuck on subway - may be 5 mins late. Sony. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 30, 2018, at 7:46 AM, (USANYS) <MIMMIN> wrote: > Definitely a friendly call. Good question on OEO. Is it the same lawyer in the doj suit as the suit v Epstein? I'm talking only about the Epstein suit for now. > Sent from my iPhone >> On Nov 30, 2018, at 7:41 AM, (USANYS) wrote: >> Is that going to require OEO approval? And even if not, he is litigating against DOJ - would think we'd want to make clear this is a friendly not hostile overture. >> Sent from my iPhone >>> On Nov 30, 2018, at 7:31 AM, (USANYS) <MIMMIE> wrote: >>> I think a way of firmly and likely publicly staking claim (which is probably the way to go here) is to subpoena the civil lawyer in case v Epstein for deposition transcripts and other materials. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> On Nov 30, 2018, at 7:04AM, (USANYS) wrote: >>» had asked for a memo, which we've had draft. We'll review this morning and circulate. As disc , re also in touch with FBI - they are in the process of pulling/reviewing the old case file. Can we plan to touch base on this and a few other outstanding issues this morning? >>» >>» >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>» >>>>> On Nov 30, 2018, at 6:58 AM, (USANYS) alga> wrote: >>>» >>>>> Another article in the NYT today. How are we putting down our marker? >>>» >>>» Sent from my iPhone EFTA00072132

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.