From: '
Summary
From: ' (USANYS)" alMIE> To: (USANYS)" <MIMIMIE> Cc: (USANYS)" Subject: Re: Epstein Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:56:24 +0000 Importance: Normal Am stuck on subway - may be 5 mins late. Sony. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 30, 2018, at 7:46 AM, (USANYS) <MIMMIN> wrote: > Definitely a friendly call. Good question on OEO. Is it the same lawyer in the doj suit as the suit v Epstein? I'm talking only about the Epstein suit for now. > Sent from my iPhone >> On Nov 30, 2018, at 7:41 AM, (USANYS) wrote: >> Is that going to require OEO approval? And even if not, he is litigating against DOJ - would think we'd want to make clear this is a friendly not hostile overture. >> Sent from my iPhone >>> On Nov 30, 2018, at 7:31 AM, (USANYS) <MIMMIE> wrote: >» >>> I think a way of firmly and likely publicly staking claim (which is probably the way to go here) is to subpoena the civil lawyer in case v Epstein for deposition transcripts and other materials. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhon
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.