Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00073623DOJ Data Set 9Other

VI LLAZOR

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00073623
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

SMITH VI LLAZOR November 28, 2021 BY E-MAIL to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Maxwell. No. 20 Cr. 330 Smith Vittozor LLP 250 West 55th Street. 30th Floor New York. NY 10019 PATRICK J. SMITH Dear Judge Nathan: On behalf of non-party the independent administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, and in accordance with the Court's memo-endorsement of our November 23, 2021 letter, we are making a third production to the Court of remaining documents responsive to defendant Maxwell's subpoena. We have posted the documents to a secure FTP site, which the Court, in its order dated November 27, 2021, indicated was a sufficient means of providing the documents. The credentials to the FTP site are the same as those we sent by email on November 26, 2021. We are producing in this production claim packets sent to attorneys for the four individ

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
SMITH VI LLAZOR November 28, 2021 BY E-MAIL to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Maxwell. No. 20 Cr. 330 Smith Vittozor LLP 250 West 55th Street. 30th Floor New York. NY 10019 PATRICK J. SMITH Dear Judge Nathan: On behalf of non-party the independent administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, and in accordance with the Court's memo-endorsement of our November 23, 2021 letter, we are making a third production to the Court of remaining documents responsive to defendant Maxwell's subpoena. We have posted the documents to a secure FTP site, which the Court, in its order dated November 27, 2021, indicated was a sufficient means of providing the documents. The credentials to the FTP site are the same as those we sent by email on November 26, 2021. We are producing in this production claim packets sent to attorneys for the four individuals identified in the subpoena and email communications with those attorneys relating to the four individuals. We have redacted these documents in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(a) and to remove references to claimants other than the four individuals identified in the subpoena. We are available should the Court have any questions. Respectfully submitted, Is/ Patrick J. Smith Patrick J. Smith Smith Villazor LLP cc: AUSA AUSA AUSA AUSA Christian R. Everdell, Esq., Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq., Laura A. Menninger, Esq., Mark Stewart Cohen, Esq., Bobbi C. Stemheim, Esq. (by e-mail) EFTA00073623

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

USDC SDNY

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 11/15/21 SMITH VILLAZOR November 15, 2021 BY E-MAIL to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Maxwell. No. 20 Cr. 330 Dear Judge Nathan: Smith Villazor LLF. New York, New York 10019 www.smithvillazor.com Patrick J. Smith may file a motion to quash the subpoena on or before Friday, November 19, 2021. The motion should not repeat arguments made in the Government's motion to quash, which is due on Thursday, November 18, 2021. The Defense shall respond to both motions on or before Monday, November 22, 2021. This memo endorsement is filed temporarily under seal to allow the parties to propose redactions. Any redactions to this letter and the Defendant's motion must be filed on the docket by November 21, 2021. SO ORDERED. We represent the independent admin'strator of the Epstein Victims

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FronIIIIIIIIIIIII(USANYS)"

FronIIIIIIIIIIIII(USANYS)" To (NY) (FBI)" Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FW: Activity in Case 1:20-er-00330-AIN USA v. Maxwell Remark Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 19:01:54 +0000 Importance: Normal From: NYSD ECF [email protected]<NYSD ECF [email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 1:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Remark This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e- mail because the mail box is unattended. •"NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS••• Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced docum

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

USDC SDNY

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 11/15/21 SMITH VILLAZOR November 15, 2021 BY E-MAIL to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge Southern District of New York New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Maxwell, No. 20 Cr. 330 Dear Judge Nathan: Smith Villazor LLF. New York, New York 10019 www.smithvillazor.com Patrick J. Smith may file a motion to quash the subpoena on or before Friday, November 19, 2021. The motion should not repeat arguments made in the Government's motion to quash, which is due on Thursday, November 18, 2021. The Defense shall respond to both motions on or before Monday, November 22, 2021. This memo endorsement is filed temporarily under seal to allow the parties to propose redactions. Any redactions to this letter and the Defendant's motion must be filed on the docket by November 21, 2021. SO ORDERED. We represen the independent admircstrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Pr

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FW: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-VSB USA v. Maxwell Notice of

From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FW: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-VSB USA v. Maxwell Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 17:23:23 +0000 Importance: Normal Also FYI. This is all we know right now, but will keep you updated. From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 12:52 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-VSB USA v. Maxwell Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e- mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS••• Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid lat

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USANYS)"

From: (USANYS)" To: Christian Everdell Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Letter Motion Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 20:29:58 +0000 Hey Chris, I think all that's left is your response on Witness-3, and then the Court's order. We'll circulate our proposed redactions to the Dietz/Loftus briefing tomorrow after the conference. Thanks From: Christian Everdell <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 2:47 PM To: Rohrbach, Andrew (USANYS) <[email protected]> Subject: (EXTERNAL] RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Letter Motion Will do. Taking care of it now. From: Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 2:42 PM To: Christian Everdell < Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Letter Motion Hey Chris — yes, and you can also file your response on GX-52. (Our original letter is already on the docket at 457.) From: Christian Everdell Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 2:40 PM To: Subject: (EXTERNAL]

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USANYS)"

From: (USANYS)" To: Christian Everdell < Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Letter Motion Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 19:41:45 +0000 Hey Chris — yes, and you can also file your response on GX-52. (Our original letter is already on the docket at 457.) From: Christian Everdell <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 2:40 PM To: I (USANYS) Subject: (EXTERNAL) FW: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Letter Motion We now file our response to the birth certificate motion, right? From: NYSD ECF [email protected] <NYSE) ECF [email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 2:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Letter Motion This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e- mail because the mail box is unattended. •••NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permit

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.