Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00074689DOJ Data Set 9Other

EFTA00074689

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00074689
Pages
3
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

EFTA00074689 EFTA00074690 From Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 9:24 PM To: Cc Subject: FW: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) (Request to Modify Protective Order (Under Seal)] From: Nicole Simmons Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 8:01 PM To: Cc: Jeff Pagliuca Laura Menninger < > Ann Lundber Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) [Request to Modify Protective Order (Under Seal)] Dear Judge Nathan, At the request of Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, please see attached Ms. Maxwell's Letter Motion, Affidavit, and accompanying exhibits filed under seal today August 17, 2020. Regards, Nicole Nicole Simmons Haddon, Morgan and EFTA00074691

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
EFTA00074689 EFTA00074690 From Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 9:24 PM To: Cc Subject: FW: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) (Request to Modify Protective Order (Under Seal)] From: Nicole Simmons Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 8:01 PM To: Cc: Jeff Pagliuca Laura Menninger < > Ann Lundber Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) [Request to Modify Protective Order (Under Seal)] Dear Judge Nathan, At the request of Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, please see attached Ms. Maxwell's Letter Motion, Affidavit, and accompanying exhibits filed under seal today August 17, 2020. Regards, Nicole Nicole Simmons Haddon, Morgan and EFTA00074691

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' To:' Cc: Subject: FW: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:55:08 +0000 Attachment Inline-Images: image001.jpg FYI From: Nicole Simmons < Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 11:57 AM To: Cc: < ; Laura Menninger ; Ann Lundberg Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) [Proposed Redaction to Request and Reply to Modify Protective Order (Under Seal)] Dear Judge Nathan, At the request of Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, please see attached Ms. Maxwell's Proposed Redactions to her Request and Reply in Support of Modifying the Protective Order filed under. Regards, Nicole Nicole Simmons Haddon, Morgan and Foreman P.C. PH FX DIRECT: EFTA00040705

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Pagel of 78

Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Pagel of 78 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit —against— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, PlaintiffiAppellee, Defendant-Appellant, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) APPENDIX Volume IV of VIII (Pages App.-0777 to App.-0852) Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys or e en ant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00076383 Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Paget of 78 Docket Entries App.-0001 Order regarding Ms. Maxwell's Letter Motion to Reconsider July 23, 2020 Ruling, Dated July 29, 2020 (Dkt. 1079) App.-0777 Notice of Appeal, Dated July 29, 2020 (Dkt. 1081) App.-0781 Non-Redacted Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley In Support of Plaintiff's

78p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Nicole Simmons

From: Nicole Simmons To: "F- ‹ Cc: Jeff Pagliuca Ann Lundbe Laura Menninger • rr Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) [Proposed Redaction to Request and Reply to Modify Protective Order (Under Seal)] Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:57:05 +0000 Attachments: 2020.08.24 JSP_Ltr._Submitting_Proposed_Redactions_Under Seal.pdf; Ex._A_2020.08.17_,ISP_Proposed_Redactions_to_Ltt_re._Modification_of the_Protective_ Order.pdf; Ex._B_2020.08.24_,ISP_Reply_Ltrje._Modification_of the_Protective_Order.pdf Inline-Images: image00 1 jpg Dear Judge Nathan, At the request of Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, please see attached Ms. Maxwell's Proposed Redactions to her Request and Reply in Support of Modifying the Protective Order filed under. Regards, Nicole Nicole Simmons Haddon. Morgan and Foreman, P C. Pi a DIRECT: EFTA00088204

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 121

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team filed a motion to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment, arguing that they are multiplicitous. The motion was filed on January 25, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The defense team is represented by multiple attorneys from different law firms.

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Cagean.g0c44/ 71SEAFierbd664164i igl5V2PilaW6M/Joagria44

Cagean.g0c44/ 71SEAFierbd664164i igl5V2PilaW6M/Joagria44 1?)f 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Objections to Unsealing Docket Entries 143. 173. and 199 and to Unsealing Docket Entries 164 and 230 at This Time. Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 EFTA00075004 CageaUlg0caAIDer0dthhilfii igl5V2Pil&iA6/2bagctacir4 2%f 3 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her counsel and pursuant to this Court's Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions, DE 1044, as clarified by DE 1053, objects to the unsealing of the Sealed Items contained in: • DE 143 (and related DEs 142, 144, 144-1, 149, 150, 150-1, 151, 152, 153, and 153- 1); • DE 172 (and related DEs 171, 173, 173-1, 189, 190, 190-1, 202, 203, 204-1, 211, 212, 212-1, and 224) and; • DE 199 (and related DEs 200, 200-1, 228,2 29,

20p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.