From: "

From: " To: Subject: RE: SDNY DAILY NEWS CLIPPINGS; MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2021 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:52:34 +0000 Thanks! From: Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 4:36 PM To: >; Subject: RE: SDNY DAILY NEWS CLIPPINGS; MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2021 Hi ME, I have seen similar reporting, and I don't know where this is coming from. Aside from the conversations surrounding the generic statement, I'm not aware of our office (or any component of DOI) making a statement like this, and our only communications have been with the UK attaché, who asked us a few questions about whether- we said it was not). From: Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 4:23 PM To: O; Subject: FW: SDNY DAILY NEWS CLIPPINGS; MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2021 Do you know the answer to question? There is a generic comment from a U.S. government official that "The U.S. and the U.K. have a close, productive... relationship." I know we reviewed and approved that comment. But I think she must be asking about the below paragraph. Any idea what that would be from? Andrew has repeatedly claimed that he has offered to cooperate with the inquiry, however the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York has previously told The Daily Beast that they want to talk to him, but have not been able to. That office sought to pile pressure on Andrew this month by reporting that Andrew was a "person of EFTA00075621 interest" in the Epstein probe and was considered "at least" a witness From: USANYS) < Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 4:19 PM To: Cc: (USANYS) < > Subject: FW: SDNY DAILY NEWS CLIPPINGS; MONDAY, AUGUST 30, 2021 Did we take the action referenced in the article? Prince Andrew's Gilded Care Closes In as Department of Justice Reiterates Desire to Speak to Disgraced Royal (thedailybeast.com) Fine if we did. EFTA00075622