Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00075841DOJ Data Set 9Other

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00075841
Pages
2
Persons
9
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Evercle11 +1 (212) 957-7600 ccvcrdclIgathcngresscr.com April 7, 2021 BY EMAIL United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue New Yoek. NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone owswoohensresser corn We write to renew our request that you produce the FBI case file concerning the investigation of We had originally asked for the file in our discovery request letter dated October 13, 2020. You denied our request for the file on October 28, 2020, stating that the file has "no relation to your client and has no bearing on the charges in this case." See 10/28/2020 Letter at 7. Now that the S2 supersedii.dictment has broadened the allegations against Ms. Maxwell up to in or about 2004, Mr. is very much relevant to the charges in this case and the file should be produced. For example, in your letter to defense coun

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Evercle11 +1 (212) 957-7600 ccvcrdclIgathcngresscr.com April 7, 2021 BY EMAIL United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue New Yoek. NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone owswoohensresser corn We write to renew our request that you produce the FBI case file concerning the investigation of We had originally asked for the file in our discovery request letter dated October 13, 2020. You denied our request for the file on October 28, 2020, stating that the file has "no relation to your client and has no bearing on the charges in this case." See 10/28/2020 Letter at 7. Now that the S2 supersedii.dictment has broadened the allegations against Ms. Maxwell up to in or about 2004, Mr. is very much relevant to the charges in this case and the file should be produced. For example, in your letter to defense counsel dated March 29, 2021, you specifically identified several Bates numbers which you say relate to the new accuser referenced in the indictment as Minor Victim-4. Those Bates numbers include messa e ads containing numerous by, by, n that we believe were taken and signed using the initials nil:e ese message pad slips appear to be some of only a handful of documents upon which the nt intends to rely to corroborate the testimony of Accuser-4. Furthermore, Mr. was discussed extensively at the February 29, 2016 meeting between AUS nd attorneys Brad Edwards, Stan Pottinger and Peter Skinner, where the attorneys pitched the government to open an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell. See SDNY_GM_02742882. The notes appear to reflect an explanation of Mr. conduct that formed the basis for his obstruction charge. See id. As you are aware, the discussions at the February 29, 2016 meeting are squarely at issue in Ms. Maxwell's motion to suppress. As such, the information contained in the FBI investigation file will be relevant at any hearing that takes place on Ms. Maxwell's motion and should therefore be produced. EFTA00075841 April 7, 2021 Page 2 Thank you in advance for your attention to these matters. Sincerely, /s/ Christian Everdell Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP cc: Jeff Pagliuca, Esq. Laura Menninger, Esq. Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. EFTA00075842

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

COHEN & GRESSER LLP .,:m.cohengesser <cm October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL United States Attorney's Office w York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil case proceed

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (MN) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION UNDER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE GOVERNMENT'S SUBPOENA TO BOLES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00077571 Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Authorities ii Table of Exhibits iv Introduction and Summary of the Argument 1 I. The Facts 2 II. The Government's Response to Maxwell's Motion. 6 A. The Government's Defenses Are Not Credible. 7 B. Assuming the Government's De

34p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

mid Avenue

mid Avenue COHEN & GRESSER LLP October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Evercle11 +1 (212) 957-7600 ccvcrdclIgathcngresscr.com October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL. , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue New Yoek. NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone owswoohensresser corn We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

ANnW COHEN & GRESSER LLP October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear ..,-:,w.cohengessercom We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COHEN & GRESSER LLP

COHEN & GRESSER LLP Thrd Avenue I ow York. NY 10022 October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL United States Attorney's Office York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil ca

8p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.