From: "IM,

From: "IM, To: ' Cc: (USANYS)" C Subject: Re: FBI remarks Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:59:02 +0000 Importance: Normal )11 (USANYS). (USANYS)" Contractor)" Got it. M. [II let them know. On Jul 7, 2019, at 3:56 PM, ) < wrote: Circling back on this from earlier this week, I don't know if this is still the operative draft, but two quick things we may want to convey on the remarks. First, page one, 2002-2005 is a four year period (not three); second, page two, there's no allegation (and it's not factually correct) that the victims "were made to give" massages — it would be accurate, though, to say ". . . who gave Epstein massages ..." Also this may just be me, but I think of a "child" as being pre-puberty — I think is going to say "underage girls" if they want to be consistent? — but of course defer to the FBI on their nomenclature. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2019 19:27 To: (USANYS) (USANYS)c ) < > Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] <. ;=. Subject: FBI remarks ct ›; (USANYS) < > Hi all, Please see the attached draft remarks from the FBI. I looked them over quickly and they seem to track ours pretty closely. Let me know if you see any issues. Thanks. EFTA00076027