Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00076624DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USANYS) [Contractor]" <=I=IMIM>

From: (USANYS) [Contractor]" <=I=IMIM> To: (USANYS)" •tt IMME> Cc: , l=liraiS!'ir (USANYS)" Subject: Re: OPA Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 02:30:13 +0000 Importance: Normal For what it's worth, the phone activity seems to be quieting down. I think reporters got (from wherever) what they needed to do stories. They seem happy to wait till Monday. Chief Public Information Officer U.S. Attorney's Office SDNY (office) (cell) > On Jul 6, 2019, at 9:04 PM, (USANYS) wrote: > Very good, thanks. > Sent from my iPhone >> On Jul 6, 2019, at 8:57 PM, (USANYS) alMIN> wrote: >> We let them know about Monday. We're not required, but we'd probably just give them a heads up if we issue any statements. >> Sent from my iPhone >>> On Jul 6, 2019, at 8:54 PM, (USANYS) alMIE> wrote: >>> Question from about OPA - have we notified them of our press plans re: Epstein (if we're even required to do so). Do we have to alert them if we decide to put out a statement tonight (I presume no bu

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00076624
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: (USANYS) [Contractor]" <=I=IMIM> To: (USANYS)" •tt IMME> Cc: , l=liraiS!'ir (USANYS)" Subject: Re: OPA Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 02:30:13 +0000 Importance: Normal For what it's worth, the phone activity seems to be quieting down. I think reporters got (from wherever) what they needed to do stories. They seem happy to wait till Monday. Chief Public Information Officer U.S. Attorney's Office SDNY (office) (cell) > On Jul 6, 2019, at 9:04 PM, (USANYS) wrote: > Very good, thanks. > Sent from my iPhone >> On Jul 6, 2019, at 8:57 PM, (USANYS) alMIN> wrote: >> We let them know about Monday. We're not required, but we'd probably just give them a heads up if we issue any statements. >> Sent from my iPhone >>> On Jul 6, 2019, at 8:54 PM, (USANYS) alMIE> wrote: >>> Question from about OPA - have we notified them of our press plans re: Epstein (if we're even required to do so). Do we have to alert them if we decide to put out a statement tonight (I presume no bu

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USANYS) [Contractor]" <=I=IMIM> To: (USANYS)" •tt IMME> Cc: , l=liraiS!'ir (USANYS)" Subject: Re: OPA Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 02:30:13 +0000 Importance: Normal For what it's worth, the phone activity seems to be quieting down. I think reporters got (from wherever) what they needed to do stories. They seem happy to wait till Monday. Chief Public Information Officer U.S. Attorney's Office SDNY (office) (cell) > On Jul 6, 2019, at 9:04 PM, (USANYS) wrote: > Very good, thanks. > Sent from my iPhone >> On Jul 6, 2019, at 8:57 PM, (USANYS) alMIN> wrote: >> We let them know about Monday. We're not required, but we'd probably just give them a heads up if we issue any statements. >> Sent from my iPhone >>> On Jul 6, 2019, at 8:54 PM, (USANYS) alMIE> wrote: >>> Question from about OPA - have we notified them of our press plans re: Epstein (if we're even required to do so). Do we have to alert them if we decide to put out a statement tonight (I presume no but just checking). Thanks >>> Sent from my iPhone EFTA00076624

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.