Subject: RE: Information from MCC
Summary
From: To: Cc: ' Subject: RE: Information from MCC Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 21:57:53 +0000 Same here, although I'm going to do one final review of my hard copy files in the next few days (which are small). by the way, was a witness in in the Epstein death case so if we plan to make . = a witness we should look at those proffer notes. From: Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 5:13 PM To: Cc: Subject: Re: Information from MCC I don't have any other disco Sent from my iPhone On Oct 6, 2021, at 4:08 PM, Hi all, wrote: I've attached the additional materials we got from here (I think he only cc'ed you on the first email), and I've copied them — except for the non-blank form, which I don't think is helpful or needs to be produced — over into a new production folder here: Do you folks have any other discovery to go out? If not, I think we should ask to stamp and push out to defense counsel as additional Rule 16. Based on the roster, it looks like the supervisor on 7/5/19 w
Persons Referenced (3)
“...or his contact information so we can set up and interview. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York New Yor...”
United States Attorney“...or his contact information so we can set up and interview. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York New York, NY 100...”
U.S. Attorney“...ion so we can set up and interview. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York New York, NY 10007 Tel: <mime...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
05/16/2008 11:16 FAX
05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/16/08 FRI 11:08 FAX UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ram Criminal Division Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section NW ; ppm .: as gton, DC 205M-0(1001 TO: Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. OFFICE NUMBER: CEOS: FAX: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. FAX NUMBER: FROM: Alexandra Gelber DATE/TIME: May 16, 2008 OFFICE NUMBER: NUMBER OF PAGES, EXCLUDING THIS SHEET: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: EFTA00214480 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/16/08 FRI 11:08 FAX ql) 002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division hief Child &Nedra:tun end Oknewthy Saellon May 15, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of/eery Epstein Dear Mr. Leflcowitz: Pursuant to your request and the request of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, we have independently evaluated certain issues raised in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein to determine whether a decision to prosecute Mr. Epstein for federal criminal violations would contradict crim
J78repsc
J78repsc 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x x HON. RICHARD M. BERMAN APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorneys REID H. WEINGARTEN MARTIN G. WEINBERG MARC FERNICH Attorneys for Defendant Also Present: - Special Agent FBI - NYPD KEYANA POMPEY - Probation Officer LEA HARMON - Probation Officer 19 CR 490 (RMB) Conference New York, N.Y. July 8, 2019 2:00 p.m. District Judge SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00083852 J78repsc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Case called) THE COURT: Good afternoon. I think I'm pretty much up to speed as to where you are in the sense that I am aware that you have been before Magistrate Judge Pitman earlier thi
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United States Attorney's Office in Miami (the "USAO"), not only has it has remained unwilling to address these issues, but Mr. Epstein's defense counsel has been instructed to limit its contact to the very prosecutors who are the subject of this misconduct complaint. For your review, this document summarizes the USAO's conduct in this case. Background 1. In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Palm Beach resident, Jeffrey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. 2. In July 2006, after an intensive probe, including interviews of dozens of witnesses, re
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for a time certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order, (DE 33), in which this Court denied a motion for stay brought by Def
J78repsc
J78repsc 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x x HON. RICHARD M. BERMAN APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorneys REID H. WEINGARTEN MARTIN G. WEINBERG MARC FERNICH Attorneys for Defendant Also Present: - Special Agent FBI - NYPD - Probation Officer - Probation Officer 19 CR 490 (RMB) Conference New York, N.Y. July 8, 2019 2:00 p.m. District Judge SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00085745 J78repsc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Case called) THE COURT: Good afternoon. I think I'm pretty much up to speed as to where you are in the sense that I am aware that you have been before Magistrate Judge Pitman earlier this morning
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.