Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00077389DOJ Data Set 9Other

U.S. Department of Justice

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00077389
Pages
15
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio!. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 7, 2021 BY EMAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: The parties respectfully submit this joint letter to provide the Court with the parties' respective positions regarding juror questionnaires completed on November 5, 2021 and November 6, 2021. I. Prospective Jurors Proceeding to Voir Dire The parties agree that the following prospective jurors should proceed to voir dire: Juror # 2 7 8 12 13 14 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 EFTA00077389 Page 2 32 33 37 43 47 48 49 50 54 55 58 62 63 70 79 82 87 89 93 96 98 108 112 113 114 117 119 120 123 124 125 126 127 129 1

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio!. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 7, 2021 BY EMAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: The parties respectfully submit this joint letter to provide the Court with the parties' respective positions regarding juror questionnaires completed on November 5, 2021 and November 6, 2021. I. Prospective Jurors Proceeding to Voir Dire The parties agree that the following prospective jurors should proceed to voir dire: Juror # 2 7 8 12 13 14 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 EFTA00077389 Page 2 32 33 37 43 47 48 49 50 54 55 58 62 63 70 79 82 87 89 93 96 98 108 112 113 114 117 119 120 123 124 125 126 127 129 131 132 147 149 151 152 153 162 EFTA00077390 Page 3 164 166 167 169 170 172 174 176 181 182 186 188 189 195 196 198 199 200 204 206 207 215 216 220 226 228 235 239 240 241 248 251 257 260 261 263 270 271 273 275 277 279 EFTA00077391 Page 4 280 282 286 290 292 297 299 304 311 312 313 314 315 326 334 338 340 341 345 347 349 354 363 366 367 372 374 378 379 384 385 387 388 391 394 396 398 403 404 407 409 411 EFTA00077392 Page 5 413 418 419 420 422 424 425 426 428 429 430 432 433 434 437 439 440 442 444 445 450 451 452 456 457 458 459 460 461 465 467 475 477 480 481 485 486 487 489 498 501 504 EFTA00077393 Page 6 505 506 509 514 516 517 520 541 542 543 544 545 549 551 555 556 561 562 563 565 566 IL Prospective Jurors Excused The parties agree that the following 'urors should be excused: Juror # 1 5 6 18 24 25 31 35 40 41 45 46 52 57 EFTA00077394 Page 7 59 60 61 64 65 69 72 75 77 78 80 81 83 84 86 88 95 97 99 100 101 103 104 106 107 110 115 116 118 121 128 130 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 142 143 144 EFTA00077395 Page 8 146 148 150 154 155 156 157 158 159 161 163 165 171 173 177 185 187 190 191 192 193 201 202 203 205 208 210 214 218 221 231 232 234 237 242 243 244 245 246 247 249 250 EFTA00077396 Page 9 252 253 255 256 259 262 264 265 266 267 268 269 276 281 284 285 287 288 289 291 293 296 300 301 302 303 306 307 309 310 317 318 321 322 323 324 325 327 329 330 332 333 EFTA00077397 Page 10 337 348 352 353 355 358 359 360 361 364 365 368 370 371 373 375 380 381 382 383 386 389 390 392 393 395 397 399 400 401 402 408 410 412 414 416 417 423 427 431 436 441 EFTA00077398 Page 11 443 446 447 449 453 455 462 463 464 468 469 470 471 472 473 476 478 479 483 490 492 493 495 496 497 500 502 503 507 508 512 513 515 518 519 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 EFTA00077399 Page 12 530 533 534 535 536 537 539 540 546 550 552 554 557 558 559 560 564 III. Defense Objections The following is a list of prospective jurors that the defense but not the Government believes should be excused: Juror # 3 4 9 10 11 15 16 17 19 36 38 39 51 53 56 66 67 EFTA00077400 Page 13 68 71 73 74 76 85 90 91 92 94 102 105 109 111 122 140 141 145 160 168 178 179 180 183 184 194 197 209 211 213 217 219 222 223 224 225 227 229 230 233 236 238 EFTA00077401 Page 14 254 258 272 274 283 294 298 308 316 319 320 328 331 335 336 342 343 344 350 356 357 362 369 376 377 405 406 415 421 482 484 499 510 511 521 529 532 547 548 553 EFTA00077402 Page 15 IV. Government Objections The following is a list of prospective jurors that the Government but not the defense believes should be excused: Juror # 34 42 44 175 212 278 295 305 339 346 351 435 438 448 454 466 474 488 491 494 531 538 Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney By: s/ Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York Cc: Defense Counsel (By email) EFTA00077403

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio!. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 October 18, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits its motions in limine, which the Government is submitting to the Court under seal by email with proposed redactions. The Government's proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although the Government's motions in limine are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of access, the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of victims—including victims who have

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 430 Filed 11/10/21 Page 1 of S

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 430 Filed 11/10/21 Page 1 of S U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York BY EMAIL USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED:11 ill /21 The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: The Silvio!. Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plana New York, New York /0007 November 10, 2021 The parties are ORDERED to submit the lists referenced in this letter on or before November 14, 2021, in accordance with Dkt. No. 427. The parties may continue submitting proposed redactions in accordance with the procedures this Court has previously set. SO ORDERED. United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) 11/11/21 Dear Judge Nathan: At the November 1, 2021 pretrial conference, the Court directed the parties to file a joint letter regarding protections for witness identities a

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Si!lo J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 21, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully requests permission to file a reply brief in support of the Government's motion to preclude the testimony of Dr. Ryan Hall. Among other issues, the defendant's opposition brief raises new arguments about hearsay exceptions that the defendant argues apply to information contained in Dr. Hall's report and further elaborates on the defendant's theory of the report's relevance. The Government proposes to file its responsive brief by noon on November 22, 2021, and to respond only regarding Dr. Hall and not the other experts discussed

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The .Wlvio J. Mello Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully requests that Your Honor allow us to arrange for the provision of secure high-speed wired Internet access in the courtroom in connection with trial in the above-captioned matter. The secure Internet connection will enable the trial team in the courtroom to stay connected to our online case repository and resources in the office during critical moments of the proceedings. This will greatly facilitate the effective and efficient presentation of evidence. In addition, we will be able to reduce the files we bring into the courtroom, as well as the traffic to and from the cou

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Sihlo J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 14, 2021 BY EMAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The parties respectfully submit this joint letter to provide the Court with a list of names, places, and relevant entities, for purposes of examining prospective jurors during voir dire. This letter is respectfully requested to be filed under seal to protect the privacy of witnesses and third parties. I. List of Names The following is a list of names that jurors may hear at trial: • Juan Alessi • Maria Alessi • • Janusz Banasiak • • Daniel Besselsen • • • • Michael Buscemi EFTA00040231 Page 2 • • Tracy Chappell • • Dr. Park Dietz

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio!. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 October 11, 2021 BY EMAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in connection with the Court's Order dated August 27, 2021 (Dkt. No. 330). The parties have conferred, in accordance with the Court's Order, and submit the enclosed joint proposed juror questionnaire and joint proposed voir dire. Where the parties disagree in the enclosed documents, the parties have so indicated and included the basis for the objections. In particular, the text proposed by the defense to which the Government objects is in green with specific objections in comment bubbles. The text proposed by

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.