alMIE>
Summary
From: alMIE> To: "a" alMIE> Cc: 'a l c=MIMIE> Subject: Re: Prince Andrew reportedly now cooperating with Jeffrey Epstein investigators Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 22:02:02 +0000 The whole premise of the article is absurd, considering (I think?) = even said in one or both public statements that we've communicated with his attorneys. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 14, 2020, at 5:57 PM, a a wrote: > Ok. Possibly a call to the post reporter as well. >> On Mar 14, 2020, at 5:50 PM, ] a wrote: >> Sony for late reply. Was • • and back to pick up at school. Didn't want him sitting on an Amtrak train fo when it's l=ly car. >> This Telegraph abomination was I, quoted wrongly and contra the ground rules. I will call this awful woman Monday to gripe, probably to no avail, and that will be the last time I ever engage with her. >> And the tenor of the story is flagrantly misleading. She asked how one can know the prince won't agree to be interviewed if there's been no communicat
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01964576
EFTA Document EFTA01682059
EFTA01837146
EFTA Document EFTA01862525
EFTA Document EFTA02032839
EFTA Document EFTA01837241
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.