Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00077565DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '

From: ' )" <1 To: ' Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:27:18 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.jpg: image002.jpg (USANYS)" Thanks! From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 8:17 PM To: ›; (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity < M> Batch four consists of batches numbered 166-231. That's a total of 65 batches, or 21.66 batches each. Here are the assignments: • : 166-187 • 188-209 • 210-231 From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:15 AM To: Subject: FW: Question re Epstein Relativity (USANYS) < Confirmed, this is the updated list of search terms. So Batch 4 is indeed the one we need to review. From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:13 AM To: Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Here is the STR. Please let me know if this is the STR you need. Thank you. From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:09 AM To: Cc: (USANYS) < •< > Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Thank I think you forgot to at

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00077565
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

From: ' )" <1 To: ' Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:27:18 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.jpg: image002.jpg (USANYS)" Thanks! From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 8:17 PM To: ›; (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity < M> Batch four consists of batches numbered 166-231. That's a total of 65 batches, or 21.66 batches each. Here are the assignments: • : 166-187 • 188-209 • 210-231 From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:15 AM To: Subject: FW: Question re Epstein Relativity (USANYS) < Confirmed, this is the updated list of search terms. So Batch 4 is indeed the one we need to review. From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:13 AM To: Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Here is the STR. Please let me know if this is the STR you need. Thank you. From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:09 AM To: Cc: (USANYS) < •< > Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Thank I think you forgot to at

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' )" <1 To: ' Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:27:18 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.jpg: image002.jpg (USANYS)" Thanks! From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 8:17 PM To: ›; (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity < M> Batch four consists of batches numbered 166-231. That's a total of 65 batches, or 21.66 batches each. Here are the assignments: : 166-187 188-209 210-231 From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:15 AM To: Subject: FW: Question re Epstein Relativity (USANYS) < Confirmed, this is the updated list of search terms. So Batch 4 is indeed the one we need to review. From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:13 AM To: Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Here is the STR. Please let me know if this is the STR you need. Thank you. From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:09 AM To: Cc: (USANYS) < •< > Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Thank I think you forgot to attach the STR hits. Mind resending that attachment, please? EFTA00077565 From: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:08 AM To: Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question re Epstein Relativity Hello - The following is regarding the batches: BATCH003 - USAO-SDFL is all of the data from the following folder: 4 USAO-SDFL Files L ail 2020.10.15 BATCH004 - OPR Materials is from the following folder and attached STR Hits: - ../ DI OPR Materials I,- [? Marie Villafana .1.— N 2020-08-26 Dil 2020-09-09 Please let me know if the batches need to be adjusted. Thank you. From: Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 5:56 PM To: Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Question re Epstein Relativity We're hoping you can clarify for us the contents of two separate batches on the USvEpstein Relativity database. Batch 003 - USAO-SDFL appears to reference the documents we've been talking with and about. Batch 004 - OPR Materials appears to reference the emails that we received from OPR and that you ran the attached search terms through. Is that correct? very much, EFTA00077566

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreference

Related Documents (6)

House OversightEmailUnknown

The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and ag...

The email chain between Ann Marie Villafana and Jay Lefkowitz discusses the potential charges and agreements related to Mr. Epstein's case, including a plea agreement and non-prosecution agreement, and the need for factual basis to support the charges.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Labor Secretary Acosta and former federal prosecutor Villafafia under DOJ probe for alleged victim‑rights violations in Jeffrey Epstein plea deal

The passage identifies a sitting cabinet member (U.S. Secretary of Labor) and a senior DOJ prosecutor as subjects of a Justice Department misconduct investigation tied to a high‑profile Epstein plea b U.S. Secretary of Labor Marty Acosta was a lead prosecutor in the 2019 Epstein federal case. Former U.S. Attorney Marie Villafafia helped negotiate a plea deal that allegedly concealed victim i Judge

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01735410

0p
House OversightUnknown

Deferred Prosecution Agreement Dispute Over Minor Procurement Charge in Epstein Case

Deferred Prosecution Agreement Dispute Over Minor Procurement Charge in Epstein Case The passage reveals internal conflicts between the defense, state prosecutors, and the State Department of Florida (SDFL) regarding the specific charge to be included in Epstein's Deferred Prosecution Agreement, including references to a threatened 53‑page indictment and a missed appeal to Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher. While it names high‑profile actors (Jeffrey Epstein, AAG Fisher) and suggests possible procedural obstruction, it lacks concrete evidence of wrongdoing, financial flows, or direct misconduct, limiting its immediate investigative utility. Key insights: Disagreement over whether Epstein should be charged with 'procurement of minors' (registrable) or 'solicitation of minors' (non‑registrable).; SDFL allegedly failed to provide factual allegations needed for a registrable offense despite multiple requests.; Defense faced a deadline threatening a 53‑page indictment identifying 40 minors and a potential 188‑month sentence.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, a violated Non‑Prosecution Agreement, and mentions high‑level officials (Deputy Attorney General, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, former President Bill Clinton) that could be pursued for further investigation. It includes specific dates, subpoena details, and names of attorneys, offering concrete leads, but the claims are largely unverified and rely on the law firm’s advocacy, limiting its immediate explosiveness. Key insights: Letter dated June 19, 2008 from Kenneth W. Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to Deputy Attorney General John Roth.; Claims that the federal grand jury investigation was re‑started in violation of a September 24, 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement with Epstein.; Alleges misconduct by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Villafana and Sloman, including alleged self‑dealing and conflict‑of‑interest.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.