EXHIBIT H
Summary
EXHIBIT H IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS Division of St. Thomas/St. John 0 In the Matter of the Estate of: ) )PROBATE CASE )NO. ST-19-PB-0080 JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, )ACTION FOR TESTATE Deceased. )ADMINISTRATION Official Transcript FEBRUARY 4, 2020 BEFORE: THE HONORABLE CAROLYN P. H. PERCELL Magistrate Judge Presiding APPEARANCES: ARIEL SMITH, ESQ. , PAMELA TEPPER, ESQ., Assistant Attorneys General Department of Justice GERS Building,Second Floor St. Thomas, Virgin Islands { On Behalf of the Government} 0 William Blum, Esq. Christopher Kroblin, Esq. Marjorie Whalen, Esq. Shari D'Andrade, Esq. Andrew Tomback, Esq. Daniel Weiner, Esq. {On Behalf of the Co-Executors EFTA00078700 Probate ST-19-PB-0080 2 APPEARANCES (Cont'd) Douglas Chanco, Esq. {On Behalf of Jennifer Araos} Kevin D'Amour, Esq., {On Behalf of Jane Doe 1,000 and Jane Doe } Richard Bourne-Vanneck, Esq. {On behalf of Tela Davis} John Benham, Esq., {On Behalf of Jane Doe} Mel
Persons Referenced (5)
“...st call him quickly. Thank you, . We have all exhibits admitted? Thereupon, KENNETH R. FEINBERG, first having been duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows: DIRECT...”
The victim“...ministrators and my staff and contractors, would be protecting the privacy of the victims. We wouldn't be sharing any information with the estate or publicly. But the confidential requirement is ...”
United States“...Q. Are you familiar with the civil lawsuit that the Attorney General of the United States Virgin Islands filed in the other court? A. Yes. Q. And have you read the Co...”
The Witness“...February 3rd at 2020. So you are properly before the Court. We will now swear the witness. Thereupon, first having been duly sworn, was examined and testified as foll...”
Ms. George“...his is something that is a very important voluntary aspect of the program. Q. Ms. George complains that the EFTA00078708 Probate ST-19-PB-0080 171 1 2 3 4 5 6...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
5/19)22, 3:52 PM
5/19)22, 3:52 PM et Al..3 Ohle:R - CAC ‘,14S-AN Nriehn- 1-yo-nc 4\) Jeffrey EpsteM -1M k ipedia Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, : Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $2OO immediately afterward.[196] • A similar $so-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.(L.291 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed. [1.19-] All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.i1X-1 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.P:t193 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014 su Flts0SE Si KC; stim 1 N)Eccri ncs FT' (<) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ( and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights ./W-by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with E stein and his limited 2008
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIM RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies, and states: I. INTRODUCTION The issue before this Court is whether the petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, had any rights under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), in the absence of a criminal charge being filed in the Southern District of Florida, charging someone with the commission of a federal crime in which petitione
Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22
Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 06)12'2009 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendants. Defendant's, Epstein. Motion To Dismiss, For More Definite Statement & To Strike Directed To Plaintiff Jane Doe's Amended Complaint, With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, Jeffery Epstein, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss and for more definite statement of Plaintiff, Jane Doe's Amended Complaint. Rules 12(b)(6), and 12(e) and (f), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008). In support of his motion, Defendant states: I. The Amended Complaint The Amended Complaint attempts to allege four counts, entitled Count I - "Sexual Battery Upon a Minor," Count II — "Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC §22 55," Count III — "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress," Count IV — "Civil Remedy for Criminal Practices" and Count VI — "Cause
10117122, 10:37 AM
10117122, 10:37 AM Gmall - Your info was found on the dark web ILIARIcar - SEx0,46._ A 805 E IR‘ (QC. • Gmaii Your info was found on the dark web 1 message Mc Cr \ fet<info@notif 'on. > Rem -T • > To. Mil>041111 1-Wi• RAC VQE [;,-"IcAfee logo el DENCe- BLA Cs< MARKET IKNCLAreriet.17- ctober 2022 at 05:12 View in browser Identity Protection Services A Your info was stolen! was found on the You asked us to keep a look out for stolen personal) information Expand ' your protection by adding more information for us to monitor. (Your personal info was stolen in a data breach, but were right here with you. We'll guide you through every step of the way to become safer again. If you believe your personal information was added for monitoring by accident or without your approval, you can remove the asset by logging into your account or by contacting McAfee Customer Support for assistance. • —.a 0 ...,,,h=eititnaarmthkl=threaria3A17460553641 610084938almofrmsa-f%3A1
STATEMENT OF
STATEMENT OF IN RESPONSE TO APRIL 2, 2019 LETTER FROM JEFFREY R. RAGSDALE To the extent possible, I have provided all information relevant to your inquiry, including applicable documents. Due to the passage of time, updates to various software and hardware, and the crash of my work laptop several years ago, I no longer have every piece of relevant material and my memory may be imperfect.' I have organized the response to conform with the April 2, 2019 letter from Jeffrey R. Ragsdale to Jonathan Biran. Please note that there were numerous oral and written communications between others at the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Justice Department with counsel for Mr. Epstein. While in some cases I was told of the communications or cc'ed on emails or letters summarizing the communications, for many conversations, meetings, and emails, I do not have knowledge of what occurred. Introduction The investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and I series of co-conspirators, named "Operation Leap
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.