To: "Weinstein, Marc A."
Summary
From: To: "Weinstein, Marc A." Cc: Andrew Tomback Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:56:07 +0000 Marc, Thanks very much. Are you able to provide it to us? If there are any issues with providing it to us, or if a call would be useful to discuss, please let us know. Thanks, From: Weinstein, Marc A. Sent: Monday, September 14, 202011:51 AM To: Cc: Andrew Tomback inves Regards, Marc iga ion Marc A. Weinstein I Partner Chair. Wride Collar Defense Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP we have the transcript of M deposition. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e- mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost
Persons Referenced (4)
“...rc, Thanks for speaking earlier. The plaintiff's name i who is represented by Jack Scarola. The deposition took place in 2009, and Jeffrey Epstein was represented by Mar...”
United States“...on, Luttier, and Coleman LLP in West Palm Beach. Thanks very much, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY...”
United States Attorney“...on, Luttier, and Coleman LLP in West Palm Beach. Thanks very much, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 E...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...i who is represented by Jack Scarola. The deposition took place in 2009, and Jeffrey Epstein was represented by Mark Luttier and Bob Critton of Critton, Luttier, and Colema...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 290 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 1 of 14
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 290 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE #3 AND JANE DOE #4'S CORRECTED MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 21 FOR JOINDER IN ACTION Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4's Corrected Motion pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action (D.E. 280), and states: I. PETITIONERS' MOTION TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL PARTIES SHOULD BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY This action was commenced by Jane Doe #1 on July 7, 2008 (D.E. I). The Court ordered the Government to file a response by July 9, 2008, which was done. On July 11, 2008, the Court held a hearing on the emergency petition. At that hearing, Jane Doe #2 was added to the petition. Now, over six years into the litigation, petitio
0338E903Etek.888893941AAAA ODCIKNOM03712 En
0338E903Etek.888893941AAAA ODCIKNOM03712 En 1'€10 ikaPRPFAftikW54/4/(1809 Pander)! !24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants, Defendant. Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedinas With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for a time certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order, dated December 16, 2008, (Document 28), in which this
Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019
From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."
To: "Weinstein, Marc A."
From: To: "Weinstein, Marc A." Cc: Andrew Tomback Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:30:01 +0000 Marc, Thanks for speaking earlier. The plaintiff's name is who is represented by Jack Scarola. The deposition took place in 2009, and Jeffrey Epstein was represented by Mark Luttier and Bob Critton of Critton, Luttier, and Coleman LLP in West Palm Beach. Thanks very much, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York New York, NY 10007 From: Weinstein, Marc A. Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 11:11 AM To: Cc: Andrew Tomback Subject: RE: SDNY investigation I just realized that you didn't share with us the deponent's name for the transcript you are looking for. Let us know so that we can make the appropriate inquiries. Best regards, Marc Marc A. Weinstein I Partner Chair. White Collar Defense Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not th
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Evercle11 +1 (212) 957-7600 ccvcrdclIgathcngresscr.com October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL. , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue New Yoek. NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone owswoohensresser corn We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of
Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.